> - keep politics in free software because it's the only meaningful thing we have
you can have your own politics personally and aside from it, or if its a one person personal project, i guess, but i will never understand this. you have a meaningful thing, the code! the project! hell you could say foss is inherently political sure but that's not the implication here im pretty certain, how hard is it to seperate it from your project you want to have adoption? the project is the neutral zone. computer code is not political, why make it as such then? there's zero to gain here
RT: https://gts.chimera-linux.org/users/chimera/statuses/01JSTAXR6XAV8N462Q96FCNRPV
you can have your own politics personally and aside from it, or if its a one person personal project, i guess, but i will never understand this. you have a meaningful thing, the code! the project! hell you could say foss is inherently political sure but that's not the implication here im pretty certain, how hard is it to seperate it from your project you want to have adoption? the project is the neutral zone. computer code is not political, why make it as such then? there's zero to gain here
RT: https://gts.chimera-linux.org/users/chimera/statuses/01JSTAXR6XAV8N462Q96FCNRPV
Follow
@ube
>computer code is not political
It *can* be, but only if you have political motivations for writing such code. For example, if you are an ancap you may write software for some P2P marketplace, but the whole idea that all code in general being political is dumb and it's only there to sabotage projects.
@ube@spergia.net
@xianc78 yeah for sure
