@jeffcliff @ChristiJunior @Immahnoob @Yako @rlier23 @IAMAL_PHARIUS
>Maybe if you don't want to be called a fascist, don't build concentration camps, openly attack the US constitution's basic rights, proclaim the benefits of censorship and using the state to go after your political opponents, and maybe don't execute hundreds of people in your concentration camps with no due process anywhere between arrest and execution. And definitely don't cheer when elon musk gives a roman salute, implements MEGAHITLER AI and when the white house employs actual open fascists as part of the core team.
this is all im saying. I DONT CONDONE CHARLIES KILLER, i think he should be tried to the fullest extent of the law but i understand why someone would go over the edge and do it.
For example, if a white guy was just living peacefully in his home and everyday there was someone who said "hey white people shouldn't have rights" (not saying that's what he was saying just giving a hypothetical) every day. then day after day the person saying this amassed a following, id understand why that person would feel threatened and want to kill the person saying it. (again, just an example off the top of my head)
>Maybe if you don't want to be called a fascist, don't build concentration camps, openly attack the US constitution's basic rights, proclaim the benefits of censorship and using the state to go after your political opponents, and maybe don't execute hundreds of people in your concentration camps with no due process anywhere between arrest and execution. And definitely don't cheer when elon musk gives a roman salute, implements MEGAHITLER AI and when the white house employs actual open fascists as part of the core team.
this is all im saying. I DONT CONDONE CHARLIES KILLER, i think he should be tried to the fullest extent of the law but i understand why someone would go over the edge and do it.
For example, if a white guy was just living peacefully in his home and everyday there was someone who said "hey white people shouldn't have rights" (not saying that's what he was saying just giving a hypothetical) every day. then day after day the person saying this amassed a following, id understand why that person would feel threatened and want to kill the person saying it. (again, just an example off the top of my head)
@LolikingSama @jeffcliff @ChristiJunior @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Yako @rlier23 You are ignorant of politics and of the ongoing problems of now too. Charlie Kirk didn't advocate for taking anyone's rights away, lmao.
@Immahnoob @ChristiJunior @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Yako @jeffcliff @rlier23 did you read what was in parenthesis?
@LolikingSama @ChristiJunior @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Yako @jeffcliff @rlier23 I know what you said, the hypothetical is extremely fucking stupid, because it was the left that constantly lied about what Kirk said and made the right out to be fascists and nazis. 
They've been doing this for more than a decade now.
They've been doing this for more than a decade now.
@Immahnoob @LolikingSama @ChristiJunior @IAMAL_PHARIUS @jeffcliff @rlier23 that faggot literally accused us everything the left does... "we attacking the constitution" but they did over 20 years with gun control and trying to shut us up, "being censorship happy", they literally censored us for a decade in every single medium possible but now that we are doing 1% of it back now its our fault we fight back now
@Yako @Immahnoob @ChristiJunior @IAMAL_PHARIUS @jeffcliff @rlier23 gun "control" isnt attacking the constitution. you can still have guns...but the means of acquiring one would be stricter.
Follow
@LolikingSama @ChristiJunior @Immahnoob @Yako @rlier23 @IAMAL_PHARIUS @jeffcliff The second amendment clearly says that the RIGHT to bear arms shall not be infringed. Restricting the means of acquiring guns would make it a PRIVILEGE, thus unconstitutional.
