The Irish aren't White.
@amerika I consider Irish white, they are a type of white, and there are many types of whites.
If Irish are "white," so are Indians, Jews, Arabs, and Libyans.
@amerika Yes, I consider them white, I also base whiteness more on body structure than on skin color. So a very dark Indian is more white to my eye than a lighter skinned person with more "afican" features.
Both have admixture, therefore are going to genocide Whites if mixed into the group.
@amerika Admixture is a broad concept, all human beings share genetic code, because all beings share genetic code. The difference between a black and a white is a spectrum, this is why a person with 1% black DNA looks white, just like how a blob of white paint with a miniscule dot of black mixed in will still look white, it is only in the details that it is not, and the details only apply in scientific matters, the majority of human life is not a scientific matter in my opinion, since science is an art applied in precise constraints, and that does not mirror normal life, scientific matters are much more taxing than normal life because of the focus required. And so I would see no problem calling someone with 1% black dna, and 99% white dna, white, even though it would be a euphemism, because in truth they would be mixed.
For thirty generations after admixture, you get those original traits re-appearing at random (atavism).
What percentage do you think that is?
You might enjoy our #HumanBiodiversity (#HBD) group on Gab:
@amerika What percentage do I think this random cropping up of traits occurs, or what percentage of admixture do I think is required for such traits to crop up (at a rate I do not know)? It doesn't matter to me if traits pop up or not, the presence of the genetic code is the trait in and of itself, it is all that is required to make someone non-white, I'm using that term scientifically, since colloquially any person not exhibiting non-white traits would be called non-white, while those who did not exibit such traits but had "corrupted" DNA, would still be called white. And so, many, many "white" people are non-white, scientifically speaking, as many "Asian" people are non-asian, due to african or white genetic code, and as many africans because of their dna being mixed with non-africans.
@amerika shit fuck I'm all over the place I give up I think you get the idea though, I'm too drunk