@mario If I participated I would be ashamed (this doesn't mean I wouldn't participate just that I would be very ashamed if I did)

@Jazzy_Butts @mario one day there's gonna be a fedi meetup for gays




it'll be all lesbians and then lecter

@bitterblossom @mario I wish Lecter would like me but he's such a pretentious faggot who is super ceral all the fucking time, can't even say nigger or retard or "damn kids are stupid" around that guy.

who is the person who shall not be named? :ablobcatsweatsip:
i don't know tham

@mario @bitterblossom He runs a little cult of personality regarding mapness, and they gatekeep the fuck out of their gay little clubhouse. They say I'm fake and shit or a troll or something just because I'm a free speech absolutist and I don't respect their touchy feely sensibilities because I'm not so retarded that I can be tricked by lovebombing or naming and shaming.

@Jazzy_Butts @mario he's a bit sensitive, and he runs NNIA, which is the sensitive zone for paraphiles.

i've got my disagreements with him, but i dont have any hate for him. his garden isn't as rough as my preferred neighborhood.
>mapness
>NNIA
fuck them lmao
legit pedophiles should seek help not create online communities around being pedophiles

@mario @bitterblossom Agree to disagree if you're saying maps are sick and need correction, no sicker than any other paraphiles at least, and perhaps even less, as studies show it is normal (NOT abnormal) to find girls as young as 9 sexually arousing. What is NOT normal and is NOT common is finding girls much younger than that to be arousing, that is unusual, behaviorally speaking. Society has to accept what is normal, before it can offer help to those who are abnormal and want the help, grouping all maps into the "banish" category will leave you with an endless war against mostly innocent people, since (statistically) every normal human man is a "map".

Founding communities around the attractiveness of living things that can't consent excludes you from my definition of normal behavior.
@mario @Jazzy_Butts the fact that you believe children are inherently incapable of any form of consent is inherently abusive and dehumanizing.
tell me how children are supposed to give consent?
they can't enter any legal contract

@mario @bitterblossom The point here I think is that it's not ethical to bar them from legal contracts, just like it was not ethical to bar certain races from entering into contracts or certain genders. If a person has a brain condition that makes them incapable of decision making that is not a factor of their age and so age should not be taken into account. If a person has their wits, they have their wits, I've seen kids you'd swear had a little old man inside their head driving them around, and I've seen adults who you'd swear were being operated by a clinically retarded toddler. Age is not the factor here.

Children can be manipulated to act against their self interest easy af, because of their naivety.
Just be nice to them and they will do what you tell them.
If we were to allow children to give legal consent, they would fck up their whole adult life.

@mario @bitterblossom Anybody can be manipulated, it is not a uniquely youthful quality, it is the quality inherent in any naive person, regardless of age. I say to you, the solution is simple, do not take advantage of or manipulate naive people, regardless of their age.

>it is not a uniquely youthful quality
That's just my experience, but I was naive af as a child and during my internship at a kindergarden I also got confirmation that you can't trust children to make informed decisions without approval of responsible adult caretakers with life experience.

@mario @bitterblossom Replace the word children with blacks, and kindergarden job with prison guard job, and reread what you just wrote

Yes, because black people's parents can just come anytime and pick them up from prison lmao

@mario @bitterblossom Yea you're not really this stupid, you can't be, I refuse to believe you're not taking the piss

Are you planning on just calling me stupid or will you explain where i went wrong?

@mario @bitterblossom I already have explained where you went wrong, and you pretended not to understand, I am confident you are playing dumb because you are smart enough to know your argument leaks like a seiv but you have moral ideals ingrained which will not allow you to entertain contrary arguments.

I'm talking about the comparison of the kindergarden and the prision.
Children can leave the kindergarden with their parents, you can't just leave prison.
Follow

@mario @bitterblossom The children do not determine when they leave, the niggers do not determine when they leave. Any other gotchas or can you drop the act?

>The children do not determine when they leave
If the child can't talk, they are too young to safely walk anyways
If the child can talk, they can ask the nurturer to call their parents to pick them up
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.