@Emperor1 @cowanon@neckbeard.xyz @CharlytheWorm @EmmaFaber @ananda
You say that is if being dangerous was a bad thing.
being able to back your will with action is what makes action not necessary. Docile people will suffer more in the long run.
@Emperor1 @cowanon@neckbeard.xyz @CharlytheWorm @EmmaFaber @ananda
Your capacity for violence constitution your constitution. Without it, you have no rights.
@Emperor1 @cowanon@neckbeard.xyz @CharlytheWorm @EmmaFaber @ananda
The worst case of jewish trickery that had been done was to to pursuade everyone to believe that rights are universal and inalienable.
I am not talking about identity and I have no idea why do you think identity plays a role in this shit. It does not change the facts that when there is no recorse for breaking your rights, they no longer exist.
@Emperor1 @cowanon@neckbeard.xyz @CharlytheWorm @EmmaFaber @ananda
Alright. I get what you're trying to say. But let's be real here. We live in a society so afraid to put their lives on line, that we killed the economy and put most of the population in "pods" as well as accepting the idea of becoming a lab rat.
You intelectualizing about violence being dangerous is like going to one of the legendary african villages and protesting giving them food because obesity is not healthy.