I am not sure how common this is, but I do tend to judge people's opinions based on their weakest argument.
For instance, if you want to tell me, that covid is a fraud, and as an evidence you present changing GDC guidelines, sudden decreases in flu cases, censorship on social media and the fact, that some test failed, when you tested a kiwi...
How the fuck am I supposed to take you seriously if you included such a retarded argument? Did you put as much thought and research to each of your arguments as you did to the last one??? seriously???
@coyote
Thanks.
Now, would you mind exaining to me why do people believe I am not concerned?
@coyote
Because I don't understand why saying I disagree with 1 point out of 20 on opinion I share caused this huge shitstorm. (And I don'tmean you in particular. Thank you for respectful response.)
Personally, on day 3 of 2 weeks to slow the spread, I already was pretty sure this was a power grab, this would never end, and there would be new diseases (turns out it was variants, I was half-right, half-wrong). I can't be too angry, it doesn't change anything. Just have to keep speaking truth.