Culturally I tend to identify more with the left too since I'm not religious and I think government policy should be data-driven and based in good science, also I think the justice system should have a significantly stronger focus on rehabilitation rather than continuing to be as punitive and ineffective at preventing recidivism as it is.
Where I deviate from a lot of leftists is that I like libertarian principles (even though I don't consider myself one) and I'm in favor of the freedom for anyone to express their views, even if some people consider those views offensive.
>strong anti-discrimination laws
(Except when they benefit Whites, men, Christians, or non-fags)
You literally do not get to play anything remotely resembling a race card until you fix this.
Oh, that's what it is! I was trying to figure out why there were duplicate wikipedia articles titled "Buffalo Shooting" and "Haitian Revolution", but they're not actually duplicates. With the "Haitian Revolution", the mass shooter was black.
>i can find a difference, therefore whatever similarities you’re drawing from go away
No.
@dave @NEETzsche @Mek101 @Hyolobrika @bonifartius
Say a single genocide made by white people that was justified then. 
@NEETzsche @dave @Mek101 @Hyolobrika @bonifartius
great minds think alike...
I don't see anything about mass racial murder (of the sort you have no qualms about "people" doing to Jews, hypocrite). So either you are full of shit (likely) or there is something Britannica is not saying for political reasons (possible).
>of the sort you have no qualms about “people” doing to Jews, hypocrite
I don’t want to exterminate Jews. I just don’t accept crocodile tears about Anti-Semitism and anti-black racism from people who support literal extermination and sexual slavery on racial grounds for Whites.
>So either you are full of shit (likely) or there is something Britannica is not saying for political reasons (possible).
Nah, the Haitian “Revolution” was literally a Where Da White Women At-tier nigger riot and anybody who tries to portray it as merely a slave revolt is off his nut.
So, since you got accusatory about this, your entitlement to good faith is, well, it’s significantly reduced. Which do you prefer:
Whites deserve land reparations in Haiti for prohibiting Whites from owning land
“Indigenous” people who got blown the fuck out by Whitey when he invaded need to sit down and shut up about getting
Both (this is the default choice if you refuse to answer directly)
about getting they land stoled*
@NEETzsche @Mek101 @Hyolobrika @bonifartius
Let him do a research. I am sure @dave is going through wikipedia right now looking for a datapoint that fits his specific criteria 
So, there's no need to push him.
Slaves (and I mean actual slaves, not just fucking "Affirmative action is wrong and also why can't I own nukes" slaves) were and are justified in using deadly force to secure their independence.
Do you genuinely not understand the difference between a genocide and a revolution?
>The Haitian Revolution wasn’t a genocide, it was a slave uprising.
It was both, so nice try. Do you have a third data point or are you conceding this point?
Scientific Theory Of Dave’s Racial Violence Views: Whites are never justified in committing mass racial violence on non-White races, but other non-White races are at least sometimes justified in committing mass racial violence on Whites.
Data Point One: Dave’s categorical rejection of mass racial violence to abolish White genocide in America/Europe.
Data Point Two: Dave’s support of White male extermination and White female sexual slavery in the Haitian “Revolution”
Current Score Of Theory: 100% (A+). Dave can lower this score by introducing more data points to it that contradict the theory. A method for weighting different scenarios will be developed if he does