Polling isn't "propaganda" just because you want to believe it is. Pick up a stats book or something, there's a whole field of knowledge about the ins and outs of polling that you don't seem privy to when you try to dismiss it as "propaganda", and both political parties use it extensively to gauge public opinion.

Bluechecks have been panicking on Twitter for months now because they understand very well that it's not just some measure that they can manipulate at will.
Look up, S.M.O.T.E and the fake-ass polling, Dave. You're embarassing yourself. I've never met a real data scientist who didn't go --- "holy shit, this is bad, really bad."
You quoted Benford's law at my and told me it's supposed to be compelling evidence of fraud, when Benford's law is only useful when working with sets of values varying by orders of magnitude and with a fairly even distribution throughout the range, which the dataset used to generate that stupid histogram wasn't.

Now you're quoting yet another technique you don't understand the mechanisms or limitations of. I am not the one embarrassing myself here.
You're claims that Biden's Magic exception to Benford's Law will get you a Nobel Prize in economics. Go for it!
Not only would it not get me a Nobel Prize, any college-level stats class that introduced the concept would include questions on the test that make sure I understood it doesn't work on datasets where most of the values are of the same order of magnitude, and I would lose points if I didn't understand it.

This is not a groundbreaking insight, this is a basic fact about Benford's Law.
Free lesson for you Dave. It is virtually impossible to honestly partition a set of data and have it NOT follow Benford's Law. Cheating occurs at the boundaries, bias shows up. How? If the biased observer see a batch at a boundary condition -- this is the opportunity to cheat (he thinks, no will notice!). A slip here, a slip there. Thumb on the scale only at the cut-offs. If your base data follows some other magic digit distribution, a similar law will hold. It's so wonderful a law. Humans such natural born liars and cheaters. Especially the Noble Liar Democrats who DON'T BELIEVE IN LAWS OR RULES!!
when I roll dice they don't follow benfords law. therefore all dice are. FRAUDULENT and don't follow LAWS OR RULES
the number of letters in words in this sentence don't follow benfords law. what you're saying is FAKE and FRAUDULENT
Follow

@animeirl @ChristiJunior @dave @polarisera @Matty @Nudhul
Debates on fediverse:
10 percent: Neetsche constructs an argument from a set of assumptions, that imply inevitable conclustion. :virgin:

90 percent:
My bolls aren't distributed based on benfords law. Your argument is invalid. :cunny_chad:

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.