I have no idea what drug caused this, but this ain't funny. it's disturbing.
Is this really just IQ?
@xue
This anwser makes it actually worse.
Are you really policing yourself and making conscious decision to say "good morning" "thank you" and "goodbye" every time you enter the shop?
Dont be ridiculous
@NEETzsche @xue
And they say, it's the autistic people who are unable to catch the social clues...
You could ask, "How would you have felt yesterday if you hadn't eaten breakfast?"
They would respond, "But I did eat breakfast. What do you mean?"
"Yeah, but if you hadn't, what would it have been like?"
"No, you didn't hear me...I ate breakfast yesterday."
"But if you hadn't..."
"But I did..."
Someone lower than that range would continue to insist that they are right and that the person asking the question is an idiot, without parsing the words more carefully or imagining the scenario (of being "born 10 years ago").
ay lmao
IQ isnt real, thats freemason bait to lure narcissistic individuals
"Oh look at me, i scored 190 on solving mazes and maching patterns" ayyy lmao
@xue @victor @NEETzsche
Go to a gypsie occupied area and talk to them. TALK TO THEM FOR 10 FUCKING MINUTES, and tell me, that IQ doesn't exist.
first of all, i dont speak gypisie
but also, i value my belongings
@xue @victor @NEETzsche
Yes.
Reducing a complex phenomenon into a single number is the essence of any useful metric.
First, IQ isnt metric, for metric you need two variables
It more resembles estimator but:
1. You can make any estimator you want, and it doesnt need to provide any useful information
2. What kind of estimator that is, when it can return different data for the same person
It is arbitrary device, to check how good you are with solving special case of mazes
And you attribute any real world value to it? lmao
1. it has to equal 0 only the same element
2. it has to be symetric, d(a,b) = d(b,a)
3. triangle inequality
It isnt metric, it is another made up shit by psychologists, who dont care about science, they just write what they think
oh, let me think of another
p s y c h o m e t r i c
xDDDD
Your score will be 5 and Luke's 10.
Here, valuable, scientific invention
@xue @victor @NEETzsche
Btw, do not think, that sociology is not full of garbage.
for example, EQ is a bullshot metric, that miraculously corresponds perfectly to breast size.
But IQ is not one of them.
Yo, what the fuck?!
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Women with big boobs have no problem in any social situation, and everyone is interested to talking to them about their feelings.
therefore, they have a high EQ.
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Well, it is what is measured.
But I'm pretty sure EQ is supposed to measure your capacity for sympathy, empathy and sociability rather than how likable/pretty you are.
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Well, next time you hear anyone describe EQ, take a moment to think, if the exact situation they describe would play differently for me, or for Big Booba Babe.
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Sure... and it magically drops at the age of 35 for most women.
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Ok, let me explain it this way.
If you have booba, every conversation you have begins with goal of the opposite party to be as likable as possible.
If you don't have booba, this expectation is reversed.
So, there is no "social skill" actually needed on the side of the woman (relatively speaking) to get desired result.
It is as if you were comparing selling stuff to giving away money. The skill required to complete task is in a completelly different reality.
EQ (Emotional Quotient) is about being able to understand others. And not just verbally.
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
Except it's fake. It is measured by self report of how well can you maintain relationships. If EQ was real, and actually did exist in women as described, divorce courts would not exist.
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
If you want to debate about the ability for empathy, I could agree there.
But EQ has nothing to do with it. Equating EQ to empathy is the same as equating feminism to equal rights. These terms are so masaquered by common understanding, that using them in some "specialized meaning" is pointless.
@NEETzsche @victor @xue @Jens_Rasmussen
I don't get it.......
No one except you uses EQ as synonymous for "charm" or "attractiveness".
There is such thing as people skills and empathy, but EQ is just a made-up way to make women feel "included" in the workplace.
"Men have higher IQ, but women have higher EQ, and EQ is actually more important in a business setting where forming connections is critical!"
That sort of thing.
🥒 😋
What is this? The 90's?
Jokes aside, EQ is an attempted way to measure empathy, sympathy and other social skills. The fact that this attempt has little to no success at producing an actually good test of measuring these skills discredits the term "EQ" as a whole, and I can understand why you'd reject it's usage for that reason.
It can more or less be translated into "social skills" the same way IQ can be translated into "intelligence", if you're using it off-handedly and in a non-scientific way.
Example:
"I have high IQ" = "I am intelligent"
"I have high EQ" = "I am good with people"
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
> "social skills"
These two women ask you to do a task for them. Do you think it's "social skills" that will make the difference?
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
And yes, the one on the right is "good with people".
Good enough actually to make her a millionare without working.
EQ is about your ability to understand, not to manipulate.
@Jens_Rasmussen @xue @LukeAlmighty @NEETzsche
“Non-scientific” is the ONLY correct way to use EQ, and to a lesser extent, IQ.
But try telling that to the office bimbos of the world.
“I’m very good with people, and it’s easy to understand and be understood. I just have a naturally high EQ!”
…Says the woman with the big boobs.
But try telling her that people only like her for her appearance, and not because she actually brings anything of value to the company table, and you’ll instantly get a sense for what her real “EQ” is, regardless of whatever retarded test she took.
@victor @xue @LukeAlmighty @NEETzsche @Jens_Rasmussen IQ correlates well with objective measures of the brain including brain size, general factor of perception, flicker fussion rate, reaction speed, and actually shows up in genetic measures, twin studies put it at 80% genetic and we're constantly finding new genes for it with SNP studies
Never heard of such a thing with EQ
@applejack @victor @xue @NEETzsche @Jens_Rasmussen
As I said before, It does exist in EQ.
EQ corelates with boob size.
@LukeAlmighty @victor @xue @NEETzsche @Jens_Rasmussen I've heard of higher IQ men preferring smaller breasts and women with mental disorders evolving large breasts as an offset, but not that
@applejack @victor @xue @NEETzsche @Jens_Rasmussen
Yes, but EQ is measured by response of an average man.
Hide behind one of her boobs and ask her about the other one. If she lies, she's not the one telling the truth, so you go through the other door. *rickroll.avi*
@Jens_Rasmussen @victor @xue @NEETzsche
OK lightbulb.
Will the scenario of "being critisized" play differently if you're attractive?
Do you have more reason's to "be positive", when everyone is suspiciously kind to you?
These are the questions from the test. I am sorry, this is not an empathy test. And neither is it a self-awareness test.
It is "how many people are trying to make my life easy in hope to get in my pants" test.
Probably? You might get critizised for different things or by different people than if you were ugly, that's almost certain. But your reaction to criticism, in terms of whether it makes you defensive or whether you take it constructively can also be completely unrelated to your looks. For example if you are criticized for your skill at something by people who can't see you.
That test you have images of looks retarded if it's supposed to be an EQ test though. Not at all related to others, but about how you see yourself, which is something completely different.
A great way to trigger people is to refer to IQ as “intelligence.” Just put the two together outright lol, lmao