Follow
@matana
Btw, you don't even have to lie.
You take a free AI painting your PC just generated.
You modify it slightly
Release it
Now, you created this unique painting, using a completely free picture, that no longer exists.
Anyone can edit the original, if they find another copy that doesn't exist, but they cannot use your image.
Or, at least I guess the law should take it this way.
🏆🏆 winner of the Holy Gab War and Holy Poast War
@LukeAlmighty @matana
Based on what the article says it sounds like they were getting too cute with it.
The process to make a piece can be copyrighted, patented. So the human "press button = receive bacon art" element can be described. They're trying to say there's no human element that made the piece but they own the copyright. Now we are in the "I own the picture this monkey took" argument.
If the AI made the picture independently of any human input, how do you own the copyright? Did the AI sell you the rights to own the copyright? If the AI cannot own a copyright due to not being aware and intelligent then how do you own a copyright and not someone else?
Based on what the article says it sounds like they were getting too cute with it.
The process to make a piece can be copyrighted, patented. So the human "press button = receive bacon art" element can be described. They're trying to say there's no human element that made the piece but they own the copyright. Now we are in the "I own the picture this monkey took" argument.
If the AI made the picture independently of any human input, how do you own the copyright? Did the AI sell you the rights to own the copyright? If the AI cannot own a copyright due to not being aware and intelligent then how do you own a copyright and not someone else?
@matana
And if not, can I sue Disney for claiming copyright on art, that was created by algoritms?
I am sure, there is some AI denoising in there