@cjd
If you call a Russian mafia "the russians", is it wrong, only because russian civilians outside of the mafia exist too?
@cjd
Would you call the objects in this image "red balls", or would you consider that to be misleading, becuase there are red balls, that were not captured by the camera?
@cjd
While your complaint is valid on a linguistic level, it is so pedantic, that if you used it on literally anything else (except for strict scientific descriptions), people would laugh you out of the room. Words representing groups do have a range of interpretations and both outliers and false inclusions. Everyone knows that at the age of 3.
I know you aren't retarded. In fact, I do like your posts quite often, so let's not lower the debate to the level of kindergarden wordplay.
It looks like a bunch of pixels to me. So do you.
There's a point at which the identity in question becomes too vague and all encompassing to be of relevance to the issue at hand. Like imagine a spam filter that just blocks all incoming email, because all spam is by definition, email.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
But if you say "The Jews" then it's implied that it's every last one of them, which is just impossible to take seriously by anyone who has Jewish friends.
@cjd
In that case, I am really sorry about your extremely poor understanding of english language, and I hope your caretaker is doing a good job feeding you.
1. There's nothing happening and if you think there is, it's because you're racist
2. All of our race are the same, it's not a sub-group
The Italian Mafia tried to do precisely this, they were just not that successful.
True, but the tribe does a lot of work to corral the lives of whites. They're the wellspring of teaching whites to hate their own kind.
@LukeAlmighty
