Which would you rather have?
And to clarify, "libertarian animal rights" mean that the pet owner can abuse and/or slaughter their own pets because it is their property.
@xianc78
Animal rights are a self-contradictory concept. Is it against a rat's rights to be eaten by a snake? Is it abuse to eat a hamburger? Or worse? What about the chemical warfare we use on animals to protect our crops and homes?
I am sorry, but although animal abuse is retarded, it is still a priviledge of being a supperior entity on this planet. So, this poll is offering one choice that is clearly a positive one, and one negative.
@LukeAlmighty @xianc78 Ultimately you're still eating animals anyway given it's ultimately impossible to eliminate insect pests from fruits and vegetables, and a decent portion of microbial life in the water/general environment are microscopic invertebrates. Meat consumption is IMO, about as morally neutral as any other source of sustenance provided the animals used as livestock are not tortured or the people involved in the agricultural process exploited.
@LukeAlmighty @xianc78 veganism for moral reasons is flawed at best
