So why hasn't Big Tech come after Fedi like they did with Parler and Gab ?.
Well, there's a couple of reasons.
1) Instances size number : in other words, they consider instances like FSE , KF, SPC and neckbeard as "small flies".
2) Decentralization : Decentralization allows a " Hydra effect", take down one instance and two more will pop up in their place. Even when federating between each other, it would nullify their efforts on shuthing dissidents down ( or more yet, stopping them from organizing ).
3) Friendly Fire: Big Tech can not take once instance alone of fedi because of 2) , if they were to take down even they "right wing" side of Fedi, they would need to take it down ENTIRELY. This creates a problem, since many staffers at Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc are connected to progressives in the masto crowd. This will backfire immediately with the progressive MSM turning on them ( for "denying a safe space to sexual minorities and marginalized people " ). A PR disaster.
4) Lolbertarian LOL : the instances are run people, not corporations. The instances do not pay alliance to any market regulation enforced by Big Tech no do they care. This make any threat hollow and void, since they are unenforceable.
@alyx @TheMadPirate I don't think that really matters so much, since once they are in, they can take their time to fully get the concept...
Especially once they met their fifth (a)sjw