Show older
@Eris @sjw @Awoo @TheAncestor @The_Vile_Delinquent @Vivi @graf @mushroom_soup the best way to get people to stop lewding the lolis is to start a hellthread and just kvetch about it constantly. Works every time. Oh wait..
@Terry @Awoo @TheAncestor @The_Vile_Delinquent @Vivi @graf @mushroom_soup @sjw

Sorry did we not ask you to stop posting child porn respectfully enough? How would you like us to approach you about this topic?

@Eris @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
If you actually had some balls, you'd just report to the police and stop bitching like an autistic sperg.

@Eris @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
If you think he's posting cp, then you think he's doing something illegal. If you know he's likely doing something illegal and don't report, you're just an accomplice to the crime. Either you do your duty as an "upstanding moral citizen" or you're just as bad as the person you're trying to vilify. That's how the law works. Deal with it.

@alyx @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi

>If you think he's posting cp, then you think he's doing something illegal
Incorrect axiom. If I report his post to the police no one will care. You know this and yet you are pretending you don't.

@Eris @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
Sorry, but you don't get to call someone a pedo for doing things that wouldn't get them a pedo conviction.

@Eris @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
He was actually investigated and we have plenty of evidence. So far, it sounds like you can't even form an accusation that could convict Terry as a pedo.

@alyx @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi

Why do you give a shit what the legal system says like it has mind control powers over you or something?
I can call a spade a spade i don't give a shit about ZOG or its courts.

@Eris @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
Then you won't be bothered if I call you a mass murderer that likes to suck Bill Gates' dick in his free time? Why should I care if the legal system wouldn't find you guilty of that? It's not like falsely calling you something could be considered libel, right?

@alyx @Eris @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi if eris frequently posted drawings of that, it’d be reasonable to conclude he has an interest in it, wouldn’t it? Possibly to the extent of carrying it out irl?

@bot @Awoo @sjw @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
Nah. Plenty of people draw or create content that portrays mass murder without killing a single fly. I don't for a second suspect the Doom devs of being interested in violently pulling guts out of people.

@alyx @bot @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi

>Plenty of people draw or create content that portrays mass murder without killing a single fly.
We're not talking about killing people. We're talking about wanting to.
> I don't for a second suspect the Doom devs of being interested in violently pulling guts out of people.
So there was this city called Columbine...
@alyx @Eris @Awoo @sjw @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi I just think it’s a false equivalence. Playing a gayme where you kill aliens or w/e is miles away from masturbating to depictions of children.
@bot I wasn't aware I was required to masturbate to the images? :blobworried: Guess I've been breaking the rules.

But anyway there's no false equivalence. Killing a character in a game isn't murder and masturbating to images isn't sexual assault or molestation or whatever.

@Awoo @sjw @alyx @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
@roboneko >Killing a character in a game isn't murder and masturbating to images isn't sexual assault or molestation or whatever.

When you masturbate to images, what those images depict betrays what you sexually fantasize about and are therefore attracted to. For example, if you are a pedophile, you would masturbate to images of children. These images might be illustrated or otherwise fictional children.

@Awoo @sjw @alyx @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @bot @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
@NEETzsche That's ... off topic to say the least. No one was contesting that masturbating to something indicates that you're turned on by it.

Bot claimed that comparing masturbation (irl molestation) to violent video games (irl physical violence) was somehow dishonest. I pointed out the apparent absurdity of her claim. She refused to elaborate and retreated to calling me a paid shill.

I guess that's as close as she's willing to come to admitting that she was wrong. :02_shrug:

@Awoo @sjw @alyx @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @bot @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi

@roboneko >That’s … off topic to say the least.

It’s pretty on topic actually, since our core claim is that those who like lolicon are pedophiles.

>Bot claimed that comparing masturbation (irl molestation) to violent video games (irl physical violence) was somehow dishonest.

It is dishonest. Having violent fantasies is normal, having pedophilic ones aren’t.

@Awoo @sjw @alyx @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @bot @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi

@NEETzsche No, it's off topic. Now you're attempting to shoehorn a discussion of what is and isn't "normal" into the conversation.

Violent videogames aren't real, they're fictional. Drawing aren't real, they're fictional. Bot made a dumb claim and now she's doubling down, deflecting, and dropping non sequiturs instead of admitting that what she said was wrong.

If she thinks she has a coherent argument then she should stop and reword it.

@Awoo @sjw @alyx @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @bot @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
625bba1a-5d44-4639-bbd9-cfbd77541369.jpg

@roboneko >No, it’s off topic.

The topic: whether or not liking lolicon is an indication that someone is a pedophile What I said: that it is On topic status: entirely ✅

@Awoo @sjw @alyx @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @bot @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi

@NEETzsche

> The topic: whether or not liking lolicon is an indication that someone is a pedophile

That was not the topic. It's funny, I'm accustomed to Eris being dishonest and obtuse but he's actually the only one being up front here. He freely admits that he thinks violent video games should also be banned.

Meanwhile bot tries to backpedal.

> oh no, I don't think *that* sort of fantasy about irl crimes should be illegal

> reeee false equivalence, they're both fantasies but only one should be illegal

> reeee shill

@Awoo @sjw @alyx @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @bot @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
cf42d1fadcab5dfffae7007cce0fae06.png

@roboneko >That was not the topic.

It is and was the topic. People who think it’s the topic:

myself,
@Eris,
@KingSoldier,
@bot

People who think it isn’t the topic:

you

Everybody except you is talking about one thing. You are talking about something else. It is you, not us, who is off topic.

@Awoo @sjw @alyx @Eris @Terry @TheAncestor @bot @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi

@NEETzsche @Awoo @roboneko @sjw @KingSoldier @bot @Eris @mushroom_soup @Terry @TheAncestor @graf @The_Vile_Delinquent @Vivi
When I was paying attention, the topic was whether what Terry posted was cp, thus making him a pedo. It was quickly established that Terry's posts are not illegal, so any speculation that he's a pedo is stupid and irrelevant in my view.

@alyx >It was quickly established that Terry’s posts are not illegal, so any speculation that he’s a pedo is stupid and irrelevant in my view.

Considering which kinds of child porn are illegal is literally a jurisdictional concern, why would you ever arrive at this conclusion?

@Awoo @roboneko @sjw @KingSoldier @bot @Eris @mushroom_soup @Terry @TheAncestor @graf @The_Vile_Delinquent @Vivi

@NEETzsche @Awoo @roboneko @sjw @KingSoldier @bot @Eris @mushroom_soup @Terry @TheAncestor @graf @The_Vile_Delinquent @Vivi

I wasn't even the one to came to the conclusion. I told Eris to call the cops on Terry if he thinks he did something wrong, as otherwise he'd basically be an accomplice to Terry's crimes. He refused. When I asked why, he said Terry's doings would be ignored. When I asked why would Terry's doings be ignored if they're illegal, he answered that they are not.

So by Eris' admission, Terry has not posted cp.

>Considering which kinds of child porn are illegal
This sentence makes no sense, as all cp is illegal. It's kinda in the definition of cp that it's illegal. Either something is cp or it isn't. In Terry's context, calling his posts illegal or not is synonymous to calling them cp or not.

@Eris His argument rests on the (incorrect) view that all child pornography is illegal. Pic related is the first definition of child pornography I could find. Notice that it explicitly includes drawings of children and explicitly states that it can be created without the direct sexual exploitation of actual children.

@Awoo @roboneko @sjw @alyx @KingSoldier @Terry @TheAncestor @bot @mushroom_soup @The_Vile_Delinquent @graf @Vivi
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.