Im not into lolis at all but its just basic logic that victimless alternatives like drawings and sex dolls reduce the demand for actual children to be victimised by offering a legal and ethical outlet without a victim.
But people just ban the ethical alternatives out of an emotional reaction. While ignoring the consequences of their actions.
They are the same as the people who think violent videogames cause violence. Despite violent crime rates having fallen.
Child predators disgust me, don't get me wrong. But unfortunately they are always going to exist and making something illegal doesn't stop it happening. No matter how large your woodchipper is.
So offering an outlet for them to vent their desires before a child rape happens seems a far better outcome than punishing them after they have raped a child or filmed a video of a real life naked child.
@Publius @SystemSock @matrix @cereal Nope
If you give an outlet to this, you are condoning those feelings. Simple as. They need to be attracted only to sexually mature people or be executed.
@natsock @matrix @cereal @SystemSock @Publius You're doing the exact thing he said. Emotional reaction without considering reality. And the vast vast majority of men are attracted to girls who aren't "sexually mature"
@natsock @cereal @matrix @Publius @SystemSock No, you're being emotional and irrational by conforming to the Jewish morality without considering reality or the past. Being overly emotional is a feminine trait btw
"just kill them" doesn't work because they need to get caught first, which is why @Publius talked about prevention.
The age of consent has always been around puberty (and generally loosely enforced anyway) until feminism pushed it up in the early 20th century. It's an artificial, Jewish imposed morality to prevent people from getting married young. This applied to every time and culture in the past.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J056v16n02_03
I am a pedophile.
The important detail i believe you’re forgeting here is of the entire concept of “age of consent” being about marriage and not sex.
Jews werent just the first to push for a change in age of consent laws but they also made it entirley around sex. The best proof of this is of one of the events which happened in britain which sparked concern that the femenist jews got a hold of was where a journalist heard rumours of young girls being sold in brothels, ones as young as 12. Unfortunatley it was indebbted fathers who had put them into this position. The solution they gave though, was not to ban brothels or prostitution, but to raise the age of consent so it wasnt 12 year old girls being legally fornicated but 16 YOs instead.
Age of consent laws changing in any other time period before this was for legalistic marriage reasons. Many european countries had laws where the AOC was 7, 9, 12, or 14. And they mostly stayed the same since the 12th century.
Jewish influence had interpretted this law in the first bastsardization they could find. By making it about a sinful act of pre-marital sex. Where theres no courting, no standard, no family backing or establishing of a long lasting relationship. These are the only real evils i think have been caused.
Frankly though, i think youre a cum brain and a gross fool. And i wouldnt desire to interact with you ever again after this
@JimMorkov I 100% agree. I meant it in exactly the way you put it. It's not about casual sex, it's about marriage. By all means, make casual sex and prostitution illegal.
@JimMorkov And with the evils, it becomes worse the older women become. Obviously the more time they spend unmarried while sexually available just means more time for "experiences". First thing the Jaffe Memo mentions is to delay or eliminate marriage.
MSM people will lose their socks because of "child marriage" happening in the States, but then turn around and celebrate soulless sexual tranny shit taught to kids. It's obvious why they have a problem with one but not the other.