@wowaname obviously because it's not finished?

why do you take this so personally? Just ignore the warning, no need to be a massive prick.

@bonkmaykr
>ignore the warning
nah, i'll do fine shoveling your body into the same pit of hell designated to all other webshits and pajeets with your anti-user mentality.

@wowaname using JavaScript is not in-and-of-itself "anti-user", you're being a massive whiny faggot. People like you are why "free software" is not taken seriously. Go be an unlikable shitstain somewhere else.

@bonkmaykr says the dude who follow requested. i've never even fucking seen you around before.
>using JavaScript is not in-and-of-itself "anti-user",
oh yeah running unaudited software on an opt-out basis instead of being given the option to install and execute it is totally pro-user. yeah i'm sure you're an Expert Programmer, faggot.

@wowaname @bonkmaykr Does this mean that I should stop using JavaScript to load navigation bars?

@xianc78 @bonkmaykr you can do that with pure css

@wowaname @bonkmaykr I'm talking about having a JavaScript file for writing the links for the sites navigation. So I can just edit the JS file instead of each page.

I know you could also do that with server-side scripting or a static-site generator, but sometimes I just want to get things done and have it run on any webserver.

@xianc78 @bonkmaykr i get things done with a makefile, version control, and rsync. it's easy to avoid client-side scripting and to generate websites.