@hj@shigusegubu.club
@matrix probably because it's free on android and 3$ on steam, and obviously since it's nintendo it's premium
@hj @matrix Any true Nintendo fan would be willing to pay $10 to play on Nintendo hardware. Really, $15 is a steal for a game with as much replay value as among us. It's only $20, what's the matter, can't you afford a mere $25? Stop being so entitled, $30 is the least you should pay for any Switch game, and really, if you can't afford $35 for an official Nintendo port, maybe the Switch just isn't for you. How can you not have $40 to spare, that's not much more expensive than a few coffees.
@LukeAlmighty @matrix that's the filthy ad-ridden version you dirty capitalist pig
@matrix Honestly, it's ridiculous how retards will groan and bitch and moan about "poorshaming". "Yes, your framerate is going to suck on a 7 year old system" is already literally Hitler to them.
@matrix free is the most expensive thing, yet people still pick them
@matrix tfw you wanna be right no matter what
@matrix Yet they have phones
@matrix So he considers the game worth playing and spending his time on, but not worth 5 bucks? If your money so much more of a precious resource than your time, you probably aren't spending your time very well.
- https://the-mad-pirate-prints.teemill.com/
@ChristiJunior @matrix Funny how many of those people who reuse to pay 5.00 US$ on a good game, would shill a 60 US$ woke p.o.s. game.
@TheMadPirate @ChristiJunior @matrix Among Us is more of a meme game you play with friends on voice chat than a great game in and of itself. Nintendo Land would've been a better version of it if Nintendo gave it online with a decent voice chat functionality.
