@matrix this is the problem of taking fiction serious

@orekix @matrix They're not taking it seriously, they just have a "ew, I don't like this" emotional response, makes a justification for it to be enforced, and then words it like a retard

@applejack @orekix @matrix
Yup. It's not that they're taking fiction seriously, it's literally that they don't understand how fiction and art work.
This picture is supposed to make the viewer feel anger and revulsion. And this is indeed what is happening to these particular viewers too. Except they have no idea what they're supposed to do with those feelings, they don't understand them, why they feel them, and end up blaming the author for those feelings. They are literally unable to process and understand that as viewers of that piece of art, it was intended for them to be able to correctly identify that those feelings were supposed to be directed at the fictional characters, as they are the ones who perpetuated those fictional crimes that made them angry.

What's with these limp-wristed faggots assuming by default that Kentaro Miura showing atrocities committed to civilians in Berserk is meant to be entertaining??
@matrix "The bad guys are doing something bad! Why would a writer do this >:("

I hate these people so much
@marisa_sharp @matrix You don't get it, if you portray evil villains doing bad things that means you support their actions and beliefs. If you portray violence against women as a bad thing that means you think violence against women is a good thing.
@matrix If it makes you react, it has something to say. It says "fuck you" to you, personally.
@matrix Imagine taking something out of context and then making the argument of, "Yeah but what is this even trying to convey? I don't understand."
@matrix Reminds me of when sjws were seething about Goblin Slayer. Same shit. How dare the author portray villains doing villainous things. 🤔
@matrix "we need to search his hard-drive"
Nigga he's dead

@matrix
>but as far as I can tell there's nothing actually being said with this
And this is why these people are 100% autistic. That image actually conveys a lot. It conveys that this faction, whoever they are, are some very evil, sick and twisted individuals. They are unequivocally the evil doers of the manga, and it is very important for the heroes to defeat and kill them, cause otherwise they will continue to commit atrocities.

That image is not supposed to be "entertainment" in itself. That image is supposed to make you feel sick to the stomach, maybe even anxious or terrified about how your favorite characters will manage to survive an encounter with them. There's not really anything "entertaining" per say about feeling disgusted by something, but art is not always about the "ha ha, that was fun, I want to see that again" MCU Avengers type "entertainment". Art does include being happy and excited, sure, but it also includes sadness, sorrow, anger, rage, disgust, revulsion, offense and many other emotions.

It's ironic how well this art worked on these individuals in triggering a feeling of offense and revulsion in them, but because they're so god damned autistic, they're unable to correctly identify that the perpetrators of the fictional crimes they hate are the fictional characters, and instead blame the author, and direct their outrage at him, instead of directing their outrage at the fictional characters.
Imagine if people directed their outrage they felt when Voldemort killed Harry's parents at J.K. Rowling instead of Voldemort. I hate that I had to give a Harry Potter example, but maybe this is the only language such people understand.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.