My friend and I were talking about population control the other day, how overpopulation is becoming a huge problem. I forgot he was mostly a liberal because we were having a good conversation, and he recoiled at my saying "part of what we gotta do is cut off aid from foreign countries so they can't sustain as many children."
He thought that was morally wrong, but I think if you're talking about depopulation at all, it's usually from a naturalist/environmentalist perspective. So in that sense, what's the problem of letting nature reclaim these third world nations? After all, if they can't fight, that's their problem. Liberals don't understand nature. They like the plants and animals, but they don't think about the wider implications. They don't understand the spirit.
Good Keith Woods video: youtube.com/watch?v=cdXEREhqoJs
He thought that was morally wrong, but I think if you're talking about depopulation at all, it's usually from a naturalist/environmentalist perspective. So in that sense, what's the problem of letting nature reclaim these third world nations? After all, if they can't fight, that's their problem. Liberals don't understand nature. They like the plants and animals, but they don't think about the wider implications. They don't understand the spirit.
Good Keith Woods video: youtube.com/watch?v=cdXEREhqoJs
Follow
@terra_ignota @ChristiJunior @Charlie Overpopulation is a fucking hoax. You can fit the entire world's population in Texas while still providing enough food, water, and shelter.
@Charlie @ChristiJunior @terra_ignota
>We need population control because I conflate population size with population density
@ChristiJunior @xianc78 @Charlie @terra_ignota Yes and also I don't want billions of niggers on this planet either.
That's a good enough reason for me, but let me offer another one. Is it morally better to make Africa's population unsustainably large so that eventually they either have to starve or go somewhere else to survive? Wouldn't it be better not to send aid so that unnatural population growth didn't happen?
That's a good enough reason for me, but let me offer another one. Is it morally better to make Africa's population unsustainably large so that eventually they either have to starve or go somewhere else to survive? Wouldn't it be better not to send aid so that unnatural population growth didn't happen?
