@cee lysander spooner, Max stirner, Murray Rothbard, sometimes prodhoun
@cee @icedquinn @herag @shebang @kerosene @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @waltercool @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex Ancap and panarchism are basically the same thing. Any anarcho-capitalist would also be a Panarchist because voluntarily choosing your own government, political, and economic system is all consistent with anarcho-capitalist principles.
I personally think that Panarchism is a much better way to express anarcho-capitalism because it doesn't imply that the free-market capitalist system is the only economic system that could exist and it could get non-capitalists on our side.
@xianc78 @cee @icedquinn @herag @shebang @kerosene @vera @matthew @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex Panarchism and Voluntaryism aren’t kinda same? Or Panarchism is only related to economy?
While I don’t agree with communism/socialism/democracy, I think it’s fair for people to pick any economic system AS LONG NO ONE IS FORCED.
This also enforce my stance against Democracy. If 99.9% of people vote and decide for Communism / Socialism / Liberalism / Capitalism, is not acceptable to force those 0.1% individuals for something they don’t want.
@waltercool @icedquinn @herag @kerosene @shebang @cee @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex Panarchism is the idea of voluntarily choosing your own government (or no government at all). It was coined by a Belgian botanist, Paul Émile de Puydt back in 1860 but remained relatively obscure due to the fact that he was not a political writer. In recent years, the ideology has been embraced by ancaps/voluntaryists because it's compatible with their principles.
@shebang @icedquinn @herag @kerosene @cee @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @waltercool @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex Choosing a government will give you benefits that you wouldn't get if you didn't choose said government (access to their schools, utilities, etc).
@shebang @icedquinn @herag @kerosene @cee @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @waltercool @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex The only difference is that it's all voluntary. If you don't want to be govern and don't care about the benefits you can simply choose to have no government at all.
@cee @icedquinn @herag @shebang @kerosene @vera @matthew@helladoge.com @0x520 @maksimilian_stepniakov @waltercool @ardaissad @lanodan @Indigo @top @Andrii @Alex Okay, I maybe confused some people. When people talk about Panarchism it usually refers to two related but separate things:
* Multiple legal providers competing in the same physical space, similar to Ancient Ireland or the Icelandic Commonwealth.
OR
* Anarchists of all flavors creating voluntary communities based on their school of thought. Basically the same thing as anarchism without adjectives but also including Ancaps into the mix.
I think I fall into the latter category, but I'm not against people trying the former.