@ryo @TerminalAutism
>When it comes to politics, Stallman-san is really an idiot.

Apparently, his mother was a huge progressive activist which could explain his Bernie-tier views. I really don't care though, as long as he doesn't force it on everyone else (i.e force his own personal political views on the free software movement)

As for using a distro without SystemD, how many programs are actually dependent on it? It's the only reason why I'm reluctant to switch to a non-System D distro.

@xianc78 @TerminalAutism Basically, if you don't need to use Gnome, KDE, or Cinnamon, and are perfectly fine with a DE like Xfce, MATE, LXQt/LXDE, or just about any WM, you shouldn't worry too much about it.
Perhaps if you're running a server and the default package manager doesn't provide init scripts for these, you can easily write your own ones too.

But apart from Gnome, KDE, and Cinnamon, I don't think you'd find any issues anywhere, and even notice a performance boost.

@ryo @TerminalAutism I heard that GTK is dependent on it though.

@xianc78 @ryo I think GTK3 is only dependent on dbus, and even that can be patched out. GTK2 on the other hand doesn't depend on that. Anyway, Hyperbola has purged even dbus from their distribution, and they have GTK3 and also some Qt stuff there, so it can all work without it. And the rest of systemd isn't much of an issue at all, really. If it was, the BSDs would be really screwed, but no.

@xianc78 @TerminalAutism I don't think so, you can run GTK-made software without SoystemD just fine.
I can even.
Though I wouldn't be surprised if they too will cuck over one day, I only expect it to happen seeing how they killed the goldmine that is GTK2 and desperately try to pretend it never happened the moment they released GTK3, but they continue to support GTK3 now that GTK4 is long out.

@ryo @xianc78 Honestly, I just don't trust Linux in general at all anymore. It glows brighter than 1000 suns. Which is a shame, because it does a few things that the BSDs do not. A package manager like Guix, that doesn't exist on the BSD world and I do think it's a very good concept. I have also been using (((AAAAAAAAAAPP)))images (I hate that "word" so much, I want to resurrect Steve Jobs so I can kill him) to mitigate updates fucking shit up, so those are nice to have too.

But still, the things that are nice with it don't outweigh the gigantic distrust that I have for it. I only still have it because my drives are formatted to Ext4 and Btrfs, and I would like to get a file server before moving them to ZFS.

@TerminalAutism @ryo At least Linux, unlike Windows or MacOS, doesn't require you to link your computer to a MSN or iCloud account. With that, I'd say that Linux is in the same level as Windows 7 (and before) in terms of respecting users maybe even better depending on the distro.

@ryo @xianc78 @TerminalAutism I tried using FreeBSD had everything setup but I just couldn't figure out how to get trezor to connect using https://www.freshports.org/security/trezord/

@fluoride @TerminalAutism @ryo I only used TrueOS which was a fork of FreeBSD that was supposed to be the Ubuntu of the BSD world but it is now discontinued. I could only get it running on a VM though.

@xianc78 @TerminalAutism @ryo fuck it I'll just stop being lazy and setup a jail and chroot into it but I might as well just use Artix or Void at that point.

@TerminalAutism @xianc78 Wait, Gentoo is his distro?

@ryo @TerminalAutism No. Install Gentoo is a meme on many technology related imageboards and it's associated with him despite it not being FSF endorsed.

@ryo @TerminalAutism The meme is made to get clueless computer users to install something that is difficult to install. It's just like the delete System32 meme for Windows users.

@ryo @xianc78 No. Just a meme. In fact, Stallman has "never installed GNU/Linux".
https://vid.puffyan.us/watch?v=umQL37AC_YM

@TerminalAutism @ryo
>Regardless of him actually mentioning them, there isn't a single thing that they do that he's against. Other than using proprietary software, but only on computers, it's fine if it's a microchip in people's brains.

Stallman is pro-cash while WEF is pro-CBDC. I also think Stallman wouldn't be a fan of digital ID because it requires a smartphone and Stallman doesn't even carry a dumbphone.

@xianc78 @ryo "I also think Stallman wouldn't be a fan of digital ID because it requires a smartphone and Stallman doesn't even carry a dumbphone."
What if it was "free software"? Also, I read his articles on the shot. He's all for firing people for not taking them and banning them from public spaces, and I think his only problem with using software to enforce that is that it's not "free software".

https://stallman.org/archives/2021-may-aug.html#3_August_2021_(Increasing_vaccination)
I only saved this, and there is no way in hell that I'm going through his website again. You can see, he is even mostly in favor of tracking, just against a central database containing all movements.

@TerminalAutism @ryo I always thought his anti-natalist views were his most disgusting beliefs (I think I remember him even saying that women should be ENCOURAGED to have abortions), but this pro-vaccine extremism probably tops all of that.

@xianc78 @ryo As usual, my position may piss off every side of every discussion in the entire universe, because it's not the position that any side takes, and it's not even the position that centrists take (they don't have real positions because they're fucking cowards, they probably can't even reprodooce anyway because they have no cojones). But I'll do it anyway.

I'm torn on the anti-natalism. Abortion is not a good thing, of course, but at the same time, it's good that people that would abort don't have children. Would you rather be aborted or be raised by them? I would pick the abortion. And it would be good if there were fewer stupid people around. We do have too many of them. Too much quantity, not enough quality. Hell, that is proven by the fact that so many people have so many abortions in the first place.

Also think about it, what if Richard Stallman's mom aborted him? The world would have one less idiot in it. Also, I would prefer to have been aborted myself. It would be even more so the case if I had to be born in recent years. Additionally, I do hate humanity and want it to go extinct unless it changes its ways and stops being shit. My position on evil is that it should stop being evil or be eradicated from existence.

Anyway, don't interpret this as me being pro-abortion. I'm not, it's more nuanced than that. If it should be done at all, it should be very fucking early, before there is any potential for sentience at all, and the woman should be sterilized and so should the man, they should lose their right to have children. I don't think even most people that don't take abortion lightly would say that it should never be done. Rape generally gets a pass, after all, but we also don't want to give women even more incentive to false false rape accusations. I don't have a solid position on what the limit should be because I don't know the timeline of all the biological processes.

Oh, I also think people should be paid to be sterilized in the first place, because then a lot of impulsive idiots would take it and wouldn't have children, and then smart people can have an environment where it makes sense to start having them. It would be voluntary, and I bet that a lot of people would do it. And then after that, not many abortions would happen. There you go, I solved the problem forever. Things being as they are, though, no one that is thinking straight would actually reproduce, because the world is hell and those kids have no future and who the fuck wants to live here? Good people think about the consequences of their actions, bad people don't, so only bad people reproduce, and bad people also have a lot of abortions.

By the way, does Stallman believe in "abortion after birth", also known as murder? Because some people actually defend that. And if he does, I suggest aborting him. Maybe we can even shove him up a dead whale's womb first if that's a requirement for him.

@TerminalAutism @ryo I understand your position because you are pretty blackpilled, but not having children is what the elites ultimately want. Raising a family shows people that they have more value than being "cogs in the machine". It's why they hate it. It's why they've been pushing all this anti-natalism crap, LGBT propaganda, and the overpopulation myth.

I think once they get the transhumanist tech right, the ultimate goal is to re-engineer the human species to be more ant or bee-like where you have sterile workers and the reproducing elite who use artificial wombs to create more workers. Those artificial humans will have no connection to any family, race, or culture, and they can be programmed to do what the elites want them to do.

The solution IS to have children. We need to create a new generation of people who are self-reliant, freedom loving, and open-minded. We just need to raise them right. Don't send them to school, teach them to value freedom at an early age, and to be skeptical of the media.

https://www.corbettreport.com/solutionswatch-multiply/

@xianc78 @TerminalAutism @ryo that's the idea behind the trans craze, a race of perfect consoomers with no attachment to culture or anything

@xianc78 @TerminalAutism The sad thing about getting people to value freedom is that they generally won't until they get to experience tyranny first hand.
Perhaps if it wasn't for me travelling to all these tyrannical and not so tyrannical places throughout Asia, Europe, and Africa, I would probably be a hatefilled blue pilled LGBT femboy bootlicker by now, which is probably part of the reason why most of Japan is still not willing to wake up and deny all calls for more freedom.

@xianc78 @ryo Your children will be hunted down and exterminated by that system and will never have a fighting chance because the war will be lost before they are old enough to even know what is going on. This is just more of that human trend that I despise, of always pushing problems to the next generation. This is our problem to solve, or to die trying to solve. And if there isn't enough good left in humanity for it to overcome its rotten nature, then it should go extinct. I was never a fan of it anyway.

Frankly, if I could press a button to wipe out all life on this planet, I would do it immediately, it would be the most moral thing that anyone could possibly do. It would also be in my own self-interest, because of the risk of me being born in this world again. Frankly, I would rather be erased from existence entirely, than ever have to live here again. To me, this planet is literal hell. If aliens showed up, I would probably want to go with them. I may go full Liquid Snake and react by shouting "I HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR YOU, BROTHERS!".

Also, people have this idea that they can just get away from the cities and be left alone somehow. Are they completely blind to reality? This is not a system that leaves people alone, it's a system that destroys anything that can compete with it or exist outside of itself.

Anyway, I think working on the people that are already here is the right thing to do. And we don't need more lives, we need more people to die, but the right people. Also, there is overpopulation in a sense, just go outside, it's fucking hell, there are people everywhere and they are all complete fucking garbage.

There are areas with low population density, because people are all packed like sardines in big cities, but if everyone suddenly woke up and decided to have some self-respect and not live under those conditions, there would be 4.5 acres of land for each person, and that's if all land on this planet is used, (we do not want that), and not considering the fact that people need resources to live good lives.

Of course, white people are not the problem here, the problem is with the other races having no self-control and no self-respect. The fact is that if the population doesn't stop growing, at some point there won't be enough space and resources for people NOT to live like cattle. And what do we get out of these high populations? Nothing good at all. People that are any good are a rarity. It's a population of mass-produced trash, and having children will either add to that, or create more people to suffer under that system.

Oh, and I should mention why I don't support the WEF and what they do. I don't support them because I want all evil to be wiped out, even if that means everyone on this planet having to die (though preferably they wouldn't, the optimal outcome would be for them to kill the psychopaths and then ascend, because humans may be inherently evil, but are capable of rising above it, and therefore should), and they want all good to be wiped out and to enslave all life forever, and for evil to become omnipotent and live forever and take over the entire universe. Very different. I don't care what has to happen as long as they don't get what they want, and that includes burning the entire world to nothing. To me, there is no outcome that is worse than their plans.

That's all I have to say. Oh, there is also the personal aspect that doesn't matter. There are almost no good women, so I'd realistically never want to do that anyway. And I would not want to have another generation of respiratory and allergy issues, and I also hate my family and want their genes to die. Also, I know how much I hate being alive on this planet, and I do not want that to be perpetuated, I am not dragging another life to this hell, fuck that. At least I see some justice in what is going to happen. If this world ends up being nothing but shit people torturing each other forever, good for them, I guess. At some point, things will get so bad that it will be impossible for people with any small amount of goodness to even be born. Then it will just be evil people tormenting each other forever and they'll at least deserve it.

@TerminalAutism @xianc78 The problem I have with marriage in general is that your wife will want to leech almost your entire income off of you, or they won't even consider marrying you.
And if you give her less post-marriage, she'll just dump you.
Your average wife over here just sits at home watching TV all day, and then complains about how being a housewife is the most difficult job ever.

And good luck even getting around as a senior system engineer while living alone, let alone junior.

@TerminalAutism @xianc78 The problem I have with marriage in general is that your wife will want to leech almost your entire income off of you, or they won't even consider marrying you.
And if you give her less post-marriage, she'll just dump you.
Your average wife over here just sits at home watching TV all day, and then complains about how being a housewife is the most difficult job ever.

And good luck even getting around as a senior system engineer while living alone, let alone junior.

@ryo @xianc78 Well, that's not a problem for me, because I don't have the money in the first place, and never will, and even if I had money, I would hide it, because it exclusively attracts bad people that I want nothing to do with. I would only go for someone that is actually compatible, but that borders on impossible for me. Everywhere I go even online (where more people are available), I tend not to like most people, and there are always exactly zero women around. Anyway, at some point in this decade, I'll end up becoming a hobo, and I probably won't be able to provide for myself and will die, so yeah, no gold to dig here.

Also, I can't be with someone that won't resist what is coming, and women are not going to resist, they are going to give in because they are fucking cowards with no morals. And of course, all of them took ze shot like they were told. So, a relationship used to be a goal, but now it's so incredibly unrealistic that I barely even consider it a possibility, and it will keep getting less likely because women are shaped by society more so than men. It was already almost impossible, and now it's at least a thousand times more unlikely.

@TerminalAutism @xianc78 @ryo
> This is just more of that human trend that I despise, of always pushing problems to the next generation.
Yes I hate this. I don't like the idea of push your kid merely as a tool in this stupid "we vs. they" game. And besides can people really prevent their kids being turned into monkeys?

@TerminalAutism @xianc78 The lethal injections is proprietary, which is a blatant double standard on his end.

@ryo @xianc78 He became what he was fighting against. He became proprietary software. The proprietary software now runs through his veins. Or clogs them up, one or the other, but presumably so does his morbid obesity, so I suppose his heart would have blown up either way.

@xianc78 @TerminalAutism It's more common than you think.
Just look at how many "anti stablishment" "dissidents" so-called are around who are all anti-CBDC, anti-digital ID, and pro-cash, and still not only carry around the very device that enables all the shit they claim to be against in the first place, they even shill for these over real computers too.

@ryo @xianc78 The Gigachad move when it comes to Satanphones would be for them to make their own websites, and then add some JavaScript that makes the website not work when displayed on mobile browsers, but that does nothing at all if JavaScript is blocked. The website itself having no JS other than that, of course.

@TerminalAutism @xianc78 I'm considering on doing the same thing again.
The reason why I didn't is simply because I have nothing useful to use the sidebars for, and I'm a lazy fuck when it comes to graphics, which is why there's such a lack of images on my website.

@ryo @xianc78 Well, I can relate to that, considering that mine still has basically nothing in it. Doesn't help that there are so many things to do. Of course, I could just do the rest, but I really want to figure out what is wrong first, and make it work on Links even though no one actually cares about that. I may not even touch the HTML directly after I have figured it out, I may just use Lisp to generate it, I don't know.

@TerminalAutism @xianc78 @ryo
"Encountering other people without vaccination is like driving a car without learning how to drive safely: it endangers oneself and others. Everyone who can get vaccinated has a duty to do so. " - Richard Stallman

@udon @TerminalAutism @ryo It wasn't long ago that leftist hippies like him were the anti-vaxxers. He also used to be strongly anti-GMO. I wonder if that has changed now that GMOs are considered a solution to climate change.

@xianc78 @udon @TerminalAutism Rather, the leftist hippies are now the establishment, and the "neonazi racist pedophile transphobic fascism homophobic antisemite islamophobic white supremisist etc etc etc" right wing are the counter narrative now.
So of course the roles are being swapped too.

@ryo @xianc78 @TerminalAutism @udon Whoever rebells the most in the most coordinated way will be focused upon picked apart and bought out.

@ryo @TerminalAutism @udon Really, the left/right stance on vaccines started to change after the autism community went after the anti-vaxxer movement, saying that even suggesting that vaccines cause autism is "ableist". Honestly, I've been seeing a lot of crackdown on the so called anti-vaxxer all the way back in 2019. It's just more foreknowledge of the scamdemic.

@udon @TerminalAutism @xianc78 Sometimes, I believe he should have remained cancelled.