@Aldo2
You are a troll. I know that, and I know you are just fishing.
But, since this took only 3 minutes of search, here you go.
@LukeAlmighty in fact, one could argue that, as with prohibition, declaring that partaking in or possessing "illegal substances" is endorsing greater crimes (of a mostly moral nature) simply creates a "black market" which is even harder to regulate than if it were open or at least decriminalized.
@LukeAlmighty do you know about the period of "prohibition" in the U.S.?
They argued that brewing alcohol/spirits, consuming it or trading it was a "moral crime".
Again, you've completely misread the very link you posted. Vaush wasn't talking about "creating". He was talking about viewing/possessing. There is a difference.
Oh shut up you fucking tard. You're like fucking 8 years my junior.
I stand by what I said then, and now.
@phnt
Thanks, but I knew what I was getting myself into.
I just posted a quick response to shit on Vaush too.
Are you even bothering to listen to the arguments that are being made?
You're calling me a "troll" but you're the one acting like a troll.
Did you even see the whole vegan gains debate when it originally aired? It was a fairly big deal back then. I saw quite a bit of it back then, which is why I remembered the actual arguments being made.
The only issue Vaush made was in choosing a laptop to represent his point. It would have been better if he used "terrorist propaganda" from Syria or something like that.
@Aldo2
> Creating CP
> crimes (of a mostly moral nature)
You are boyond salvation my dude. I really hope for your sake, that hell doesn't exist, because if it does, you are getting a premium package.