Show newer
JazzFLASH boosted
JazzFLASH boosted
JazzFLASH boosted

hot take, ~2000°F 

if you are pro-censorship, i want you dead.

thats my line. im drawing it right fucking there. everybody else has a demographic they just cant fucking tolerate, a group of people theyll gladly woodchipper. this is mine. if you want to prohibit the spread of information, be it real shit or fictional games or art, go fucking die.

censorship is NOTHING but bad. it helps NONE of us, it protects NOTHING and NOBODY.

and if you are fucking insane enough to think that de-anonymization and the loss of privacy is acceptable - whether or not you realize that the entire purpose behind these movements are to enable censorship of your thoughts you think and what you communicate to other people - you are already a lost cause and a significant hazard to the future of our species.
JazzFLASH boosted

this post WILL offend a lot of you. i dont care. if this offends you, it means you are exactly the sort of person this post is targeting. 

to reiterate:

censorship is bad.
censorship does not work.
censorship WILL harm YOU.
there is no "good" form of censorship.
there is no form of censorship that cannot be abused and twisted to target unintended targets.
there is no form of censorship that humans will not choose to abuse and twist into a weapon to serve their own purposes.

all censorship is ineffective at best and actively harmful to the cause instigating the censorship, as well as to completely innocent bystanders and subjects that get dragged into it.

censorship has NEVER been successful.
censorship inevitably leads to atrocities, particularly genocide, when it is allowed to flourish.
censorship CONSISTENTLY leads to an overactive response by the censored, the evolution of methods used to bypass censorship, and surges in recruitment/support for the censored party.

no matter what or who or why you argue for censorship, YOU ARE WRONG and you make yourself a villain at least equally villainous to whoever or whatever you are trying to censor. the attempt to disallow for the spread of thoughts and opinions, to enforce ignorance and idiocy, regardless of intent, is PURE EVIL.

censorship IS oppression.
censorship IS evil.
censorship WILL be abused and its intended results overreached by whoever and whatever is given the authority to control, judge, and execute the censorship.

if you believe that exceptions exist to subjects, individuals, groups, etc, that deserve to or need to be censored, or that censorship actually helps to protect people from bad ideas and hostility, you are - at best - woefully and pathetically naive and ignorant about reality. or your ability to rationalize like a civil and intelligent person is crippled and biased by your personal emotions, traumas, or malevolent opinions. and that is quite literally the nicest possible judgment i can give to you.
JazzFLASH boosted
JazzFLASH boosted
JazzFLASH boosted

The people at Twitter finally got to the next stage.

God, they take forever.

Don't you wish you could be a long lived sea creature with no predators, a painless existence, and virtual immortality? Don't you wish you could be spores? Don't you wish that? If you were spores you could seed new worlds, outliving the suns death by traveling to new solar systems.

Oh wow, fedi frens not touching base with me, fedi frens not giving me cuddles when I go quiet, what's new T-T

JazzFLASH boosted
JazzFLASH boosted

I just realized I forgot to post this here. My bad. XD

Come together races, come together genres, let the healing begin, and the division end
youtu.be/UfWVsKgfybc

JazzFLASH boosted

I have a theory. Don't get mad. I'm a feminist. Ok, now that's out of the way. I theorize (like other anthropologists) that ancient peoples did not understand the connection between mating and pregnancy until they began domesticating dogs, because the human gestation period is too long for a correlation to be made, but a dogs is not. So in our natural state, before we learn about "paternity", this is how things operated: Women are known to become pregnant, how and why this happens are theorized on and most of them are wrong, regardless women are seen as a somewhat mystical being that brought life. What then, was the purpose of men? I believe this logically follows, a man back then was not equal to a woman, because he could not bring life, at best, he could serve the woman to gain her favor (abuse could and would occur but it would not occur within a patriarchal society with patriarchal customs, and so I do believe any man known to have harmed a lifegiver OF HIS OWN ACCORD would be punished by the whole tribe. So what then was the purpose of men?? Men were the enforcer class of the women who could best entice them, best mother them, best instill in them instincts to protect her. Men were originally supposed to be the enforcement class for the most evolutionarily desirable women. Theory. Please do not get angry at me, disagree respectfully if you must.

Imageboards went from being edgy to being bootlickers, they went from being badass like Spawn in the 90s to lame like Spawn in the 2010s.

JazzFLASH boosted
JazzFLASH boosted

back to basics. pencil tool. feng zhu blaring in my ear. import coffee cooling on the coaster. life is tolerable

JazzFLASH boosted
Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.