Hot bitches just making money for being hot (not even for having sex) have always been a thing and it's not new because of internet or anything. VHS tapes of hot women, in spandex, doing "exercise" have always been a booming industry. They even had old vhs taps of girls with big tits shooting guns using swords or whatever "super cool" thing you can think of. It's nothing new.
I'm the type of person who notices patterns really well. They even said so when I was being tested as a kid to see what was wrong with me, apparently my iq is very high so I seem retarded to actual retards because they're too dumb to know they're the dumb ones. This makes me very good at "reading" people, and at first I didn't understand it but as I aged I learned to trust my gut. So if someone was shitty to me if I notice someone with the same paterns as the person who was shitty to me I know now they're likely to be a similar kind of person to the one who was shitty to me, and are thus likely to be shitty to me, and lo and behold I'm usually right.
Fiction/Fantasy
Two lovers embrace, surrounded by freshly killed human bodies. "They will never know love like ours *kiss*." "Their *smooch* love is weak, it is diluted for all man*kiss*kind!" "*Heavy breathing* Yes! We are *armpit inhale* the pure ones!! The new Adam..." "*Gasp* and Eve."
The two make perfect pure indivisible love among the corpses of their enemies.
How can someone who likes porn and sex be anti poly? IDK HOW CAN SOMEONE LIKE FICTION BUT NOT REAL STUFF HUH HOW IDK!? I'VE *NEVER* LIKED POLY IDEOLOGY!!!!!!!! FROM THE MOMENT JOE ROGAN HAD THAT FILTHY FAT LITTLE FAGGOT WHO WROTE SEX AT DAWN ON HIS SHOW TO PROMOTE THEIR PIG IN SHIT LIFESTYLE I HAVE HATED IT. YES WHEN I WAS YOUNG I THOUGHT MAYBE POLY WAS A GOOD SOCIAL STRUCTURE BUT IT IS *NOT* (FOR ME). POLY IS *DISGUSTING* TO ME, IT IS *FILTH*, JUST LIKE MOST PORN, FILTH, BUT IT CAN BE HOT, BUT IT'S STILL FILTH. FILTH CAN BE FUN, BUT ADMIT IT'S FILTH AND DON'T PRETEND IT'S WHOLESOME, OR A "RELATIONSHIP".
I HATE POLYAMORY AHHHHHH I HATE POLYAMORY I HATE POLYAMORY IT'S FAKE IT'S FAKE IT'S FAKE IT'S FAKE IT'S FAKE AHHHHHHHH YOU'RE ALL SINGLE AHHHHHHHHHHH YOU'RE ALL SINGLE PEOPLE AND YOU'RE FUCKING AND YOU MIGHT BE FRIENDS BUT YOU'RE ALL STILL SINGLE AHHHHHHHHH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH YOU CAN'T BE IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH MORE THAN ONE PERSON OR THE RELATIONSHIP DISSOLVES THAT'S NOT A RELATIONSHIP THAT'S JUST FUCKING AHHHHHHHHHH IT CAN BE FUN BUT ADMIT WHAT IT IS STOP TRICKING PEOPLE AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
@sasagoxian people’s excuses for being against incest usually boil down to two major reasons:
“it’s inherently abusive because of power dynamics!”
as far as i can tell, this argument is completely based on the idea that the nuclear family is a natural structure that must be held sacred. like, whether the person making the argument is even aware of it or not, that’s where the heart of it lies. i just cannot understand a reason why incest would still be bad in a theoretical utopia where children are raised communally and blood relation is seen as far less significant than it is now.
anyway, when you point out the flaws in this argument and ask them about same generation incest, or incest between twins, or incest between people who don’t even realize they’re related, they usually break out the second reason:
“it’s bad because if incestuous couples have babies, the babies will be deformed!”
and i feel that this is just an absurd thing for a self-identified leftist to say, because it so blatantly echoes the sentiments of people who think that those with hereditary conditions shouldn’t have biological kids in order to keep the gene pool pure and healthy or whatever, y’know? eugenics is probably not the perfect term here, because as far as i know the term refers to a more deliberate process, so it might be more accurate to say that it’s based in ableism instead. but yeah, that’s my thought process behind this!
The Trench