Show newer

Oh look! A fedi notification! I bet it's a positive interaction w fren :comfyhappy:

Nope just a person I can't mute telling me how wrong I am with no real arguments! :jahy_disgust:

JazzFLASH boosted

So I’ll be doing my best to upload my newer content here since twitter has decided I broke rules

JazzFLASH boosted

Matt Walsh: "I violate my kids consent all the time" KEK DEFINITELY THE RIGHT SIDE GUYS

Show thread
JazzFLASH boosted

Todd gets his cock sucked, but at what cost?
coloured by mia of @TeamPervy (they're great and good)

Hmmmmm am I
ANTI-C in practice
but
PRO-C in theory? Like in an ideal world only woth no malicious people.

BUT having said all that, I am not sure if it's wise to allow child/adult relationships while all these creeps are roaming around, like all these faketrads, if society was mostly tradchads and their tradchad tranny shaman wives, then the aoc could be lowered because everybody would be pretty chill and normal, no crazy weirdos beating up their minor partners or threatening or manipulating them or anything. Once society is mostly normal people instead of these psychotic faketrads and ALSO the fakeprogs on the left. FAKEPROGS and FAKETRADS both FEAR TRADCHADS AND PROGCHADS

Show thread

Not that it's any of certain people's BIZ, but I have been thinking deeply on pedophilia lately, the last few weeks/couple months. It all started when I saw an episode of star trek where an alien visited the ship without anyones knowledge, it befriends a young girl, and after observing for a while unseen, it decides that the adults on the ship are oppressing the children, Picard then explains that children have restricted freedom to protect them not harm them. And I ultimately agree about that, and in that moment I suddenly understood the antis position, they're not repressed or in denial, they genuinely believe that they are protecting children from harm, that harm being the psychological and/or physical impact that sexual contact may potentially have. Letting your child free climb mount everest for example, may not result in the childs death, but it's not unlikely, depending on many factors, such as who is guiding the child, the guides level of skill and personability, the climbing equipment, the elements, and any number of others. And so I would agree it's reasonable to stand in the way, so to speak, of a child reaching and attempting to climb everest, no matter how determined they were, they could try when they had gained the skills and experience in less dire situations as a precursor to Everest. I get it, I get all that. Where me and antis ("normal people" as they call themselves) differ in view may be two fold, first: I think they may see sexual contact (consider its mildest form, petting, gentle snuggles and rubbing, nothing more) as a greater danger than I do, and maybe there is something I'm not getting. I understand that children are easily manipulated and that the sex drive in humans is strong and so there would be people who would take advantage, but those people already take advantage, social norms do not dissuade them when the opportunity occurs. You do not know what you are talking about if you deny this. But this predatory type of interaction is wrong no matter what the social norms, this is not what I'm talking about when I question the validity of adult/minor relationships and you know it. All things being equal, a sex positive society is preferable to me than a sex negative society. This may seem very odd for someone with such personal feelings of disgust regarding sex and sexuality but those feelings were not always present in me, they were acquired through negative social experiences involving SHAMING. The SECOND point of disagreement may be: that different people are ready to "climb everest" at different ages, and that putting a hard line based on age for participation in social sexuality is wrong in that it violates every ethical norm of our society. There was a time when parents were part of the decision about when a "child" was ready to "go with boys" or "go with girls", and everybody knew that it was very possible that a "man" or "woman" of 10 or even 20 years senior could end up with a "young woman" (girl) or "young boy" (respectively, homosexuality was not yet accepted in those days). Nobody cared about these age differences, unless the parents DIDN'T LIKE the older suiter, in which case they'd chase them off, and if the girl or boy really had their heart set on their OLDER PARTNER they would RUN AWAY AND GET MARRIED. THAT'S THE WAY LIFE WAS YOU IDIOTS. FAKETRADS SEETH AT THE REALTRAD BASED CHAD.

AND TRANNYS ARE TRAD YOU FUCKING IDIOTS, YOU CUCKOLD FREAKS, TRANNIES HAVE BEEN AROUND AS SHAMANS SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME YOU SCUM, FAKETRADS! FAKE!

If you like lolicon you are a pedophile
Do not cry to me about it

I had to turn off notifications because some cheeky little fuck won't let me mute him.

I hate how blacks are thought of as demons, because demons are supposed to be badass.

JazzFLASH boosted
> Since the eighteenth century European enlightment, a belief has grown to the point where it is now so all-pervasive, and so fundamental a part of the Western world view, that one is generally considered mad if one questions it. This is a belief that has proved so powerful and useful that virtually everyone in the Western world accept it without question. Even those who try to maintain a belief in "God" tend to place more actual faith in this new belief for most practical purposes.
>
> I am about to reveal what this fundamental contemporary belief is. Most of you will think it is so obvious a fact that it can, hardly be called a belief. That, however, is a meassure of its extrordinary power over us. Most of you will think me a madman or a fool to even question it. Few of you will be able to imagine what it would be like not to believe it, or that it would be possible to replace it with something else. Here it is: the dominant belief in all Western Cultures is that this universe runs on material causality and is thus comprehensible to reason. Virtually everyone also maintains a secondary belief that contradicts this - the belief that they have something called free will, although they are unable to specify what this is...
> ...
> I would like to mention my other favourite iconoclasm in passing without explanation. I reject the conventional view of post-monotheistic Western psychology that we are individual unitary beings possessing free will. I prefer the description that we are colonial beings composed of multiple personalities; although generally unafflicted with the selective amnesia which is the hallmark of this otherwise omnipresent condition. And that secondly there is no such thing as free will; although we have the capacity to act randomly, or perhaps one should say more precisely stochastically, and the propensity to identify with whatever we find ourselves doing as a result.
>
> All the gods and goddesses are within us and non-materially about us as well, in the form of non-local information.
>
> I consider that all events occur basically by magic; the apparent causality investigated by classical science is merely the more statistically reliable end of a spectrum whose other end is complete Chaos...

--- Peter J. Carroll, *Chaoism and Chaos Magic, A Personal View*
JazzFLASH boosted
Pedophilia is when you see a canonically sixteen year old character's panties for 20 frames in a fighting game.

Goodnight my fedi loves, from across th street to across the sea

I don't know why people get upset about my psychic gf posts or friday night shabbas posts or my opposition to current aoc laws in specifically the usa and broadly "the west". I'm pretty normal and I am fully capable of taking care of minors without letting creepy weird fucking internet shit leak into the interaction, you who doubt need more faith in me.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.