I think I'm going to start using atheist debate tactics on academia fags. For example, when they want to proposition something, they hold the burden of proof. They need to show that it must be this specific thing and can't be anything else. Eyewitness testimony is summarily dismissed; just because it's written in your little paper means nothing. That could be fabricated. Also prove that your video evidence wasn't AI. There is "no evidence" for whatever it is you're claiming

Yeah but my point is that the extreme level of skepticism that atheism/academia fags levy against religion would come off as completely ridiculous if levied at "credible" institutions like universities or mainstream newspapers.

@NEETzsche
I know...
But I saw a faggot here recently, who thought, that linking me to Jan 6th Wikipedia is an argument.

Not a "premise", or a proof. He thought, that a link itself was an entire argument from start to finish.

@NEETzsche
And to be honest, I seriously preffer the extreme skepticism to people screaming "teh science says that I am correct"

Extreme skepticism is usually weaponized against things one just doesn't agree with. It's usually applied selectively. I bet the guy who expected you to take the Jan 6 Wikipedia article at face value would laugh in your face if you copy-pasted a section of the Qur'an to him as an argument for basically any topic.

Extreme skepticism when not selectively used like this is basically just applied solipsism lol

lol u r assuming someone wants to get into an intellectual debate and not physically attack you
couldnt see the other guy thought u were talkin to yourself
Follow

@n3f_X @NEETzsche
Ok, that is 2nd guy who thinks I'm invisible from NCD in 2 an hour... interesting.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 0

I think that instance disabled your account.

Anyway, I really think I'm going to do the selective extreme skepticism thing against soyence people as a bit. "Your peer reviewed scientific journal article doesn't count as evidence at all until it's canonized by one of my ecumenical councils."

I don't know why they'd block you personally. You don't say anything terribly offensive. You just post sperg shit, which is like... kind of the norm on fedi lol

Just require that they generally comply with the federal rules of evidence. Require that they provide a percipient witnesses as to all factual matters to be established, and expert testimony from an expert meeting the daubert-frye test as to scientific matters. And make sure that they establish the authenticity of all writings, and otherwise lay a foundation. 😏

@matty why can't @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club's posts be found? Did you disable him, and if so, why?

I don't recall if I defederated him or not. :blob_shrug: I could refederate him until he posts something that makes me remember why lol
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.