I think I'm going to start using atheist debate tactics on academia fags. For example, when they want to proposition something, they hold the burden of proof. They need to show that it must be this specific thing and can't be anything else. Eyewitness testimony is summarily dismissed; just because it's written in your little paper means nothing. That could be fabricated. Also prove that your video evidence wasn't AI. There is "no evidence" for whatever it is you're claiming
@NEETzsche
YES!!!
I am so happy you discovered scepticism.
Yeah but my point is that the extreme level of skepticism that atheism/academia fags levy against religion would come off as completely ridiculous if levied at "credible" institutions like universities or mainstream newspapers.
@NEETzsche
I know...
But I saw a faggot here recently, who thought, that linking me to Jan 6th Wikipedia is an argument.
Not a "premise", or a proof. He thought, that a link itself was an entire argument from start to finish.
@NEETzsche
And to be honest, I seriously preffer the extreme skepticism to people screaming "teh science says that I am correct"
Extreme skepticism is usually weaponized against things one just doesn't agree with. It's usually applied selectively. I bet the guy who expected you to take the Jan 6 Wikipedia article at face value would laugh in your face if you copy-pasted a section of the Qur'an to him as an argument for basically any topic.
Extreme skepticism when not selectively used like this is basically just applied solipsism lol
@n3f_X @NEETzsche
Ok, that is 2nd guy who thinks I'm invisible from NCD in 2 an hour... interesting.
I think that instance disabled your account.
Anyway, I really think I'm going to do the selective extreme skepticism thing against soyence people as a bit. "Your peer reviewed scientific journal article doesn't count as evidence at all until it's canonized by one of my ecumenical councils."
@NEETzsche @n3f_X
Yeah, I guessed as much too.
Just fedi being fedi as always.
@n3f_X @NEETzsche
I couldn't agree more ![]()