Switch 2 Pricing Discussion
The price of the Switch 2, at $450, is actually not bad at all. The closest comparison to it is the Steam Deck which is more expensive and not as performant. The Switch 2 has a higher refresh rate screen with VRR that is larger in size and resolution too. It's not an OLED screen, in relation to the comparable model, but it should still be pretty good. Then you've got the actual game performance too which Switch 2 will certainly be better at, I think that's a given.
I think we all would have liked to see it cheaper, but then again I never imagined that it was actually going to be as focused on power. I thought they would MAYBE go with a 90hz screen MAX. I definitely didn't expect them to have Metroid Prime 4 dropping with 1080p 120fps support. With or without any upscaling shenanigans that's still pretty damn impressive for a handheld like that. I think the price is pretty fair.
When it comes to the price of the games, that's getting a bit more on the iffy side. $80 really is too much, I think. It's a big ask. I am still of the opinion that instead of trying to go bigger and bigger with games, causing the jumps in price (alongside the obvious issue of inflation), development teams really should focus on making extremely tight and fun experiences that can be easily replayed. Nobody was asking for Mario Kart World to be an actually open world game with like shitty secrets to find if you veer off course or anything. Keeping it at $60 or even $70 while adding in all of the amazing stuff to the actual races themselves would have been honestly so much better. I am actually curious to see how much Kirby Air Riders is priced at, because I can see that actually being a $60 game with Sakurai at the helm. Dude knows his shit.
Then again, if $80 is going to get me 300+ hours of gameplay like Mario Kart 8 DX did, I don't think it's that bad of an investment on enjoyment. You go to the movies once and pay like $15 for a 2 hour thing that cost about the same as a video game, so it does scale to a pretty astronomical level. Not to mention, the game is one purchase that can be enjoyed by a bunch of people all at once. It sucks that it is priced so high, and that our purchasing power is so low, it really does. Is it still kind of fair though? I guess if you really want the game, yeah. It's going to definitely filter some people out, though, and I think that is partially why they included it in that bundle for essentially $50 instead. People were going to buy the damn game anyway, and now they're going to pay for a $20/year subscription too.
Switch 2 Pricing Discussion
@beardalaxy ¨
What were you smoking?
Ok, first off, I do get, that Nintendo believes themselves to have a perfect cash cow. They made an analysis, and found out, that they are the only portable console on the market.... but:
Portable PC market was literally never better.
Steam deck is and always was marketed as a luxury item. And even that is cheaper now then the Switch 2. It is CHEAPER.
And that is before you download the first free game, and play it online for free.
Sorry, but Switch 2 is literally a horrible offer in all ways. Some idiots will buy it for brand loyality. Damn, I have a collector co-worker who just buys everything nintendo just to keep it, but when it comes to gaming, I literally cannot see the value there at all.
@beardalaxy
> But dammit, I want to play those Ninty games and I fucking hate how good they are because I would not be buying them otherwise xD
Sure, and obviously, this point is the only one that matters to you.
But, to just push the "it's stronger" line on switch is pointless, when you realize, that now, it is no longer creating it's own monopolized market, but pushing into an "expensive handhelds" market itself, where there are several other consoles already.
Also, comparing it to Oled version is just dumb, especially if you want to talk about the "efficiant spending" choice.
@beardalaxy
> switch 2 offers a more compelling package from a performance standpoint than the Deck does
And this is the claim, that I seriously do not understand in the slighteest. It might be a few points stronger here and there, but why would I care, if it will be used on games with no options page in the first place, and games will have motion blur enabled?
@LukeAlmighty yeah so that's the part of you that is saying that the steam deck is worth more to you specifically, as someone who is a pc gamer. i 100% get that and it's why nintendo is the only console i'll consider getting, just for their games lol.
what i'm talking about is the raw price of the console manufacturing itself, which i wouldn't be surprised if nintendo is like barely breaking even on at most considering that valve looses money on the deck. they could have cut it back and put it at a price that seemed more palatable, but a major complaint with the original switch is that it just wasn't powerful enough so they pushed more into that territory while also pricing it competitively with similar things (handheld PCs and the other consoles).
@LukeAlmighty i'm not talking about efficient spending at all, i'm more talking about realistic pricing. if you wanted to go about efficient spending, then you'd probably buy a used Deck and a used Switch and have a shit ton of games to play for the rest of your life. the fact is that the switch 2 offers a more compelling package from a performance standpoint than the Deck does, and for a cheaper cost versus its only somewhat comparable model. nintendo COULD have priced it lower if they skimped out on a few things but they didn't, and that's why you get the price it currently is (plus obviously inflation because holy shit the original switch would be $400 if released today).