Show newer

@teslanaut

The UN *is* the vehicle for driving forward the NWO Global Governance. Agenda 21, now renamed to Agenda 2030. Likewise with the Codex Alimentarius, wich is part of it.

All these agenda's are the opposite of what they pretend to be. It's like the US creating a "Patriot Act" wich does exactly the opposite of what it's name suggests. The same with like "Net Neutrality" laws. The last thing you want controlling your internet is any government.

@Locksmith @Synclair
And when I think about it, I heard it from about at least 3 of my friends.

They all did believe, that when Trump is gone, the riots will stop...

oh... the low info normies...

@aven
I didn't say that I disagree. :pepelol:

I just said, that it's so deep, it's funny how everyone knows it's happening on some level, yet noone seems brave enough to ever look into it :trump:

Well, except for autistic people of course ..

@aven Honestly, nothing new.

I still remember when I saw a video of an autistic guy being interigated for 3 hours, so he start's saying one meme after another from boredom...

The memes were spicy enough to get him jailed, but were they what he thought, or just a mind desperate to end it?

"I am not- I am actually, I am trying to twist you a little bit because in that, believe it or not, your mind will kick in.

We like to control our mind. And when we do that, we can convince ourselves of a memory.

But when you're under a little bit of stress, which is what I'm doing to you purposely, your mind can be a little can be a little bit clearer, and we're going to do a different exercise too, to make your mind a little bit clearer. So, but this is all on purpose.

I am not scaring you, but I am scaring you."
- Russell Strasser, USPS Office of the Inspector General


This federal agent was trying to make a postal worker who witnessed fraud, doubt their own memory, and recant their claims of witnessing it.

This psycho federal agent should be in a federal penitentiary.
Show thread

@feld
Pretty much telling... of what?
You have just named a single policy a one individual datapoint that could mean literaly anything.

I have asked alex@gleasonator.com a serious question, so the lieast you could do is to try stripping all of your assumptions and write your thought process as you see it instead of just pointing at a single point on a graph.

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.