@NEETzsche @ChristiJunior @dave @KingSoldier @nerdman @Matty @guts
Yes, programming is hard to break, and it takes years to start breaking of all the layers...
@ChristiJunior @KingSoldier @NEETzsche @nerdman @Matty @guts
That is why I asked the definition of slavery.
If the slave is defined by results of lazyness and stupidity, then it will always be an anti-white issue, and there is no point of debating it.
If it is defined by extraction of resources enforced by violence, then white men are enslaved.
And I would love to hear @dave definition, but it has to be prescriptive, and without exception based language.
@dave @ChristiJunior @KingSoldier @NEETzsche @nerdman @Matty @guts
So, what is your definition of slavery?
@dave @NEETzsche
I am pretty sure I did use it correctly, but who knows.
Either way, if you want, I will re-phrase the question.
Is there any difference, that could be characterized by a significant change in the concepts themselves, instead of just the same concepts being used under a different name?
@dave @NEETzsche
I am listening... ![]()
Taxes are frustrating because they are (often) spent inefficiently. But the money is (ostensibly) being spent to make the general public’s lives better, which includes you. By contrast, slavery is an individual forcing you as an individual to work to advance his interests, without you being provided a wage, or having personal freedom. One is a lot more unjust than the other.
@dave @NEETzsche
This is a semantical difference.
Slave master used the money he collected to build houses, food and medicine to his slaves too.
Slaves had exactly as much freedom as the master allowed. And now, if some prime minister gets butthurt, you loose your bank account from day to day. You have no freedom a politician doesn't sign first.
Politicians also can choose how much money goes to their own interest as opposed to their slaves.
So, my question remains tha same. Is there a non-semantical difference?
@dave @NEETzsche
So?
hot take
@Crux_Invictus
We need another aids.
Not because gays, but because it SOMEHOW didn't reach an average slut.
@realcaseyrollins
Maybe, but that isn't the point of a descriptive name.
Name should just point to a topic. This isn't chemistry.
>>>Satire account<<<
Fascism:
When you don't let people abuse your kids.
LukeAlmighty DO NOT have any pronouns. You can only refer to LukeAlmighty by LukeAlmighty's name. Please, be tolerant of this.
Please be patient, LukeAlmighty have autism
Never forget #metoo
🇨🇿
I you are in Czech republic, DM me, I'll be happy to grab a beer with you
>>>Satire account<<<