Show newer

@medvidekpu
81...
Opravdu mi chcete říct, že znásilnění je čin tak bezvýznamný, že prvních 80 případů kde ignorovat?

@Hyolobrika
I know you heard this anwser before, but it's literally 1984.

Now, to the real one. It's a signaling tool. Of your group all use the same language, it takes a single sentence to know, if they share the same beliefs. It it the entire point of tribes. And while some idiot tried to kill off tribalism by forcing everyone into the same society, with no barriers, and destroying the old family structure. After a while, the build up pressure had to be released somehow.

And now, you have 2 tribes, that don't agree even on the definition of a woman living in the stabbing distance of each other.

@kamilv @srandista @jfpavlik @petrkou
Na toto mám rád větu:
Svobodu slova nepotřebuješ na výměnu receptů na boršč.

@jakubzelenka Je peklo, že novináři už nebudou mít vůči pravidlům soukromé společnosti imunitu?

@xChaos Investice jsou - stejně jakákoliv predikce - ruleta.

Karel Janeček má smůlu, že nebyl ani rozvedčík za komunistů, ani estébák ani nerozdavál tituly.
Pro Čechy je trochu popletený matematik asi málo.

@kamilv @mig @fuxoft @medvidekpu
Proč by potřeboval volbu, když byl obdařen tou nadřazenou možností i od přírody?

@Curvin
It's always better to add "cyka blyat" whenever a teammate refuses to use english.

@fuxoft @mig @medvidekpu
Ano, to vím taky.
Ale když porovnáš povinnost pracovat a neschopnost pracovat, tak určitě rozumíš, proč můj táta vidí komunismus jako moudrý způsob vlády.

@Loukas What makes you think "journalists," in particular, are entitled to this, as opposed to anybody else? And we all know that you think that a "journalist" is anointed role; I can't just become a "journalist" out of the blue by starting my own publication. No, only some very special publications get to anoint "journalists."

You want "journalists" to be a special caste. A kind of person who's entitled to more than anybody else. To you, "democracy" isn't rule by the people and for the people, it's rule by "journalists" and for "journalists." When you speak about Our Democracy, normal people aren't necessarily included in that. Only those who the "journalists" approve of are. You think your newspapers and your TV news stations and your blogs are the books of life and of death.

And we know this is how you think of "journalists" because this is how you write of "journalists" as opposed to anybody else. Twitter is a private company and can do what is wants, until "journalists" get shut up as opposed to some pleb who has to work for a living.

@istvan @pietkuip @ChristiJunior

You no longer fully own the movie you bought, your next car will not work 100% even though you bought it if you don't keep paying, your smartphone is not fully yours since you are not free to repair it even though you own it, your home devices "betray you" by sharing data with companies even though you have welcomed them into your home...

I'm sick to death of this technological modernity.

@moffintosh @mactonite
But let's say, that evil corporations own the government.

Do you agree then, that government shouldn't have the power to destroy small businesses and print money to benefit the big corporations?

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.