LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@sumikasumi @Distolero
Come on man.
Dem normies are crazy. I was once told, that entering a gas station to buy just complimentary wares without buying the gas too is considered wrong.

These people will outright tell you that me DOING A WILLING TRANSACTION INSIDE A SHOP is somehow wrong because I do not want their main offer. You cannot make this shit up.

@sumikasumi @Distolero
Ignore stares
Become ungovernable

Enjoy a cold bottle of milk. It is the only way to live free.

@Sabex
No, invisibility while you want to be invisible.
Because we don't have a different word for people who are invisible against their will, and those, who can control it.

You can choose one
What power would you want?

Rise and shine Mr @stux . Rise and shine...

@Stellar
It's amazing to see just how further have we pushed humor.

Modern humor is the pinacle of human progress, and looking back makes you truly appreciate it.

Talking to spinsters is truly fascinating.
I know they are the worst example of anything, but to say, that only men are violent, and then say, that all men shouls meet one of the few fates that are actually much worse then death (lobotomy), now that is the level of empathy we're dealing with here.

As they say, seing is believing, but these things are way too pure to most people to understand

@ImpoliteFemale @EmmaFaber @EmmyNoether @PennyLope
Set your standarts as high as you want, but if see a man complaining about severe problems in his life and your response is "lol, doesn't count" , then don't be confused when men say that women are incapable of feeling empathy.

@EmmaFaber @EmmyNoether @PennyLope
I don't abuse women, I am laughing at spinsters. The mere fact you call me reacting to your schizoposting abuse is perfect comedy to me.

@jeremiahsnell
Well, the virus is from China, so what did you expect?

@deprecated @SamTherapy @indianafirst @RMIV
C++ is short for C + strings + more stable.

I am not sure what else would I need from it...

@realcaseyrollins
Now, let's say it was caused by a trauma.

What does it change, if 10 years later, she still advocates for extermination of half of human population? When comes the point, where you are allowed to fully critisize a person again?

Because if you go by pure causality, then noone is ever guilty. If you go by free will, aplying judgement is a moral act. If you go by causality with inclusion of chemical reaction to incentives, then noone is ever guilty, but they still have to be punished to change the number of future crimes.

Morality is a difficult subject, but sooner or later, I think most people come to the conclusion, that forcing others to want improvement is the only moral action in most situations.

@PennyLope
I am sorry the entire debate got off topic.
Either way, my point was, that throughout my life, I learned to never trust anyone who vlaims to want to help me. No matter, if it is about mental health, medicine or something similar. Doctors never cared enough to ask the simplest of questions before they start throwing at me experimental solutions. A psychologist I went to cared more to talk about her problems then to learn mine.

So now, I trust only people who I know where exactly fo they benefit. If their payout does rely on them helping me. And the institution of marriage for instance becomes completely unacceptable for a man, who looks at it from this view. So these problems realy are everywhere nowdays.