@RikaDerufu @PrettyHateMachine @takao We've reached the part of the conversation where we can no longer take a woman's word at face value. In your case, you're focusing on extremely explicit details (muh knees) and this is probably obscuring a greater truth. You say you were dressed like a normal tourist, but we have no way to judge what you consider to be normal, and going by your unironic use of the term misogyny, we can safely conclude that your judgment is poisoned at least to some degree by radical feminism.
I'll use an example to demonstrate. I once saw a young woman walking around asking for directions wearing long pants and a normal shirt and she was turning heads with every step she took - obviously due to misogyny. But what I conveniently left out was that her "normal shirt" was a spaghetti strapped cami top, her "long pants" were a pair of pajama pants which were comically form-fitting particularly in how they hugged the fuck out of her ass, and the area she was wandering around (in flip flops) was a trade school. This bitch was frolicking around a campus of workshops full of burly men learning how to use fucking welders and shit, acting oblivious while dressed like she had just rolled out of bed.
Even if she wasn't wandering around a physically dangerous area looking ready for a nap or a romp, it would still be a retarded way to go out in public. If questioned, she would certainly say she was dressed "normally" and that you were the weirdo for looking twice at a woman who covered up her legs completely and was only showing her arms and shoulders, you creepy sex pest.
There is no part of a woman's appearance which is accidental, and the look that they work to achieve always has a sum that is greater than their parts. Skirting the line of plausible deniability is women's most common defense mechanism to being criticized for crossing a social boundary, so you'll find that men are unusually resistant to this tactic when presented with it online.