LukeAlmighty 🇨🇿 @LukeAlmighty@gameliberty.club

@lebronjames75 and people criticize me for not wanting anyone but myself to govern me. what is this?

@applejack @lebronjames75 @cirnog Well this is the problem, people complain about the possibility of a weak or incompetent king, but in that case his ministers just keep shit running until somebody figures out a way to get rid of him.
Democracy is at best, even assuming everybody is operating in good faith, the exact same thing as a weak king. It removes the possibility of a strong king entirely, the sort of king who might for example expel the Jews.

@HitterNeverQuitter @EdBoatConnoisseur @TornadoOfTerror @RikaDerufu >Does Nazism require a rejection of Jews?
that kinda depends on the situation/country the national socialism is being applied to, German NS identifies/identified jews as a hostile peoples acting in ways which were/are to the detriment of the volk (german people)
>Could you have a Jewish Nazi?
In german NS, potentially, but only per nuremberg laws or special exceptions (like at most 1/2 jews proving loyalty to the volk rather than to their jewish tribe) I believe
you could also technically have a 'jewish nazi' as in, a zionist (i.e. a 'Nazi but for jews instead of germans')
>but couldn't you be a national socialist and not want to exterminate Jews?
German NS (and virtually all western countries for that matter) would require jews being identified as a hostile outside peoples/tribe by necessity/reality, however if you were to apply it to a country that has no jews/jewish influence (dunno if that even exists lol) then potentially I suppose.