@s8n@posting.lolicon.rocks @j@shitposter.world @alyx@gameliberty.club is that logo a premature surrender flag? Looks like the grifters running it already know they're next.
@j @PurpCat @beardalaxy @s8n
Nobody has the resources to keep YouTube going. Doesn't help that the platform is a mess. Everybody complains how much disk space the video content uploaded to YouTube costs, but at the same time YT offers a shitload of codecs and encode qualities for video and audio.
Streaming on YT is probably a disaster for them. Everything gets re-encoded several times over. You get one realtime transcode to h264 during streaming, and then once finished it gets reencoded again to h264, then to vp9, and maybe even av1. With resolutions from 1080p down to 144p.
YouTube's inefficiency drives me up the walls every time I think about it. If you want to see me rage, just mention "YouTube codecs". Heck, just mention YouTube...
@s8n @alyx @j nope, given the anti trust pursuit currently and the complaints about monopolization they are subject to being treated as Bell was.
It's not a for sure thing, but a likely outcome given the current track.
Could go nowhere ofc, but I give it 50/50 at the moment and the market might enjoy another IPO like when GE Capitol was shed to become Synchrony
@s8n @JustinCody @j
Question: my general understanding was that pretty much every project/site under Alphabet isn't profitable on its own, and that the entire thing only stays afloat because AdSense can make money from the collective data you share with the entire ecosystem as a whole. Fragment the ecosystem, and the data that can be collected becomes fragmented and worth less to advertisers.
So is there any part of Alphabet that could be chopped off as a result of an antitrust lawsuit? (without dooming it or Alphabet to financial collapse).
@alyx @s8n @j you would have to start making profitable business decisions for other units.
Surprisingly, shareholders haven't caught onto this yet.
Just because it's your major income source doesn't mean you get exempted from monopolistic behavior/ anticompetition sanctions, and being broken up.
Doesn't mean they lose all the revenue as they can contract with adsense as a third party.
@s8n @alyx @j yeah it's called a business.
Let's take all that experience and compete with AWS. Rumble is doing that on a limited scale.
Google Workspace monetize that. Now do that with every or as many product lines as possible.
So many product lines get shutdown due to not generating revenue.
Businesses fail all the time. There is no right to exist. What you see is a tremendous misallocation of capital. Loss leading is a brute force strategy and not particularly efficient.
@j Yeah, I know. It's a shit rebrand.