🚨🇨🇳📈China’s HUGE $586B Trade Surplus RESHAPING Global Trade

H1 2025 Customs Data Just Dropped – Here’s What You NEED to Know:

✅ RECORD-BREAKING SURPLUS: $586 BILLION—Biggest Ever for First Half

✅ EXPORTS SOAR to $1.8 TRILLION (+5.8% YoY)

✅ IMPORTS FINALLY REBOUND: $1.2T (+1.1% YoY) – First Monthly Growth Since February

🌍 GLOBAL TRADE REALIGNMENT IN MOTION:

🔻 US Demand WEAKENS: Exports to America sink -16.1% YoY (But slightly improve from May’s -34% CRASH post-trade deal)

🔺 ASEAN GAINING MOMENTUM: +17% SPIKE in shipments to Southeast Asia (Filling the US gap)

⚡️WHY THIS MATTERS:

Tariffs & Trade Wars are FORCING China to diversify, which means reliance on the West

ASEAN is the NEW growth engine

US-China tensions STILL weighing down on trade, but recovery signs emerging
IMG_20250715_163553_179.jpg

@BasedLunatic
> I wouldn’t discard China in comparison to US
I would. Search "tofu dreg" on YouTube to see how well China builds stuff. I'll wait.

@alyx that’s what the standard answer is from people regarding China, the common person, meanwhile they have to make it illegal to import Chinese electric cars to Europe because they can’t compete. And China was first out with 5g tech, many European countries installed 5g from China before Trump said it was a danger.

@BasedLunatic
>they have to make it illegal to import Chinese electric cars to Europe because they can’t compete
Bruh, you're clueless. China gives massive amounts of subsidies to the electric car industry. Much more than US does. The reason Europe can't compete, is because the cost of the cars isn't actually covered by the buyers, it's covered by the communist government. Ever heard of something called unfair competition? China is literally selling cars bellow cost, to destroy European industry. So yeah, you bet your ass we should ban Chinese cars.

>And China was first out with 5g tech
No it wasn't. Not even close. All China does is steal technology, then sell bellow the price of companies who actually did the research and development, thus making those companies unable to recover the costs associated with researching, and ultimately lead them going bankrupt.

Go and learn some shit before you shill for China.

@alyx It’s their capitalist system, there’s no such thing as unfair competition in capitalism. This is cope. Capitalists would sell us poison, and they do even if it kills us, in food, beauty products etc. unfair competition, LMAO seethe and cope. This is dumbest thing I heard ever. It’s all about the money, stupid. Who is the one saying it’s unfair competition, the countries who don’t benefit, so they cope by using a buzzword. Everyone knows capitalism doesn’t have any limits or rules, it’s about global planetary domination and nothing else

@BasedLunatic
China is not a capitalist system, jesus fuck! Yes, selling bellow cost with the express purpose to eliminate your competition is literally illegal. You know jack shit about economy I guess.

@BasedLunatic
>using Grok instead of using your own brain, and actually searching for yourself.
Bravo. I knew this day would come.
Here's a hint for you. China TRIED going capitalist and free, back in early 2000s. But after Xi JinPooh, everything reversed course. These days China is about as locked down as it was during Mao. You can't talk about capitalism when literally every big corporation is mandated to have CCP members at its leadership, so they can steer operations.

There is no free capitalism. It's a state planned economy. And one that is failing fast.
I mentioned the electric vehicle subsidies earlier. That's part of state planning. They also had state planned electric vehicle renting. Go see how that turned out, with cars abandoned in massive parking lots because there was no market demand for it. They also had state planned bike rentals. Same story. There are mountains of fully functional trashed bikes because there was no free market demand, just communist planned economy. They literally have state planned ghost towns, not just buildings, entire towns that were build by government decree, not because there was real market need or demand.

You can't claim China's economy is capitalistic when you have project after project that isn't driven by market economics, but by the whim of CCP or Xi JinPooh himself.

Oh, and let's not forget the disappearance of their own "tech mongols" without a trace. Definitely the mark of capitalism, and not communist meddling when the state doesn't like someone. /sarcasm

@alyx China may be described as authoritarian capitalist.
But how they system is made up it's clear from what scholars says and economists says in consensus the system has a capitalist function.
" China's economic system is a complex and often debated topic. While the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officially describes it as a "socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics," many scholars and economists consider it to have significant capitalist features.
Here's a breakdown of why it's a mixed picture:
Elements that resemble capitalism:
* Market forces: A large portion of the economy operates on market principles, with supply and demand influencing prices and production.
* Private enterprise: There's a thriving private sector that contributes significantly to GDP, employment, and innovation. Many large and successful Chinese companies are privately owned.
* Foreign investment: China has a high degree of openness to foreign businesses and actively encourages foreign direct investment.
* Stock markets and financial markets: These exist and allow for private share ownership, which is a key characteristic of capitalist economies.
* Profit motive: Both state-owned and private enterprises operate with a strong emphasis on profitability.
* Integration into the global economy: China is a major player in international trade, a member of the WTO, and its firms compete globally.
Elements that retain socialist/state control:
* Dominant role of the state: The government, through the CCP, maintains significant control and influence over the economy. It sets overall economic direction, implements industrial policies, and guides development through five-year plans.
* State-owned enterprises (SOEs): While their proportion of overall industrial capacity has declined, SOEs still dominate strategic sectors like banking, energy, and telecommunications. Many large and successful Chinese companies are still state-owned or have close ties to the government.
* Land ownership: All land in China is technically owned by the state or collectives.
* State direction: The state can direct and guide major aspects of the economy, including both state and private sectors.
* Financial repression: The government has historically kept interest rates low, effectively providing cheap capital for state-favored industries and projects.
Different interpretations:
Due to this mix, different terms are used to describe China's system:
* Socialist market economy: The official term used by the CCP.
* State capitalism: Many scholars argue that the extensive state control and ownership, even within a market framework, make it a form of state capitalism.
* Authoritarian capitalism: This term highlights the combination of capitalist economic practices with an authoritarian political system.
In essence, China has adopted many features of a market economy and capitalism to drive its remarkable economic growth and lift a large portion of its population out of poverty. However, it has done so while maintaining the political control of the Communist Party and a significant degree of state involvement and ownership, distinguishing it from traditional Western capitalist systems."
Follow

@BasedLunatic
More AI answers then? Care to actually search real information for yourself?
> Market forces: A large portion of the economy operates on market principles, with supply and demand influencing prices and production.
I literally just debunked this. You can't talk about supply and demand when literally Xi JinPooh decides that he wants China to be known for technology X (these days it's AI and 5G), pushes insane subsidies, and demands the market pretend to do AI and 5G, so they can make propaganda with how "China is top AI and 5G expertise".

>Private enterprise: There's a thriving private sector that contributes significantly to GDP, employment, and innovation
How can you call it private sector when every corporation is demanded to have CCP officials in their leadership? Who get to have control over the companies?

>Profit motive: Both state-owned and private enterprises operate with a strong emphasis on profitability.
Again false. The incentive for corporations is government subsidies. They don't make a profit from selling to people. They make a "profit" because the government subsidizes stuff.

Did you even read the shit you posted? You literally even have arguments there that clear go against China being capitalistic.
>Land ownership: All land in China is technically owned by the state or collectives.
That's a communist feature, not a capitalist one.
>State direction: The state can direct and guide major aspects of the economy, including both state and private sectors.
Communist feature.

Other examples in there are literally irrelevant. A communist nation can have outside investments,
can take part in international trade, probably can have a stock market of sorts too.

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.