Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫
💀
@alyx@gameliberty.club
- Gender:
- Yes, I definitely have one of those.
- Sex:
- Yes, please!
- Clan:
- Hyūga
- Nationality:
- Martian
- Location:
- Neptune
- Occupation:
- Retired
なんで君はこれを読んでいるかよ
Just another random person passing by.
Oh hi.
The Alyx Vance must go this way anyway.
Gordon Freeman dies in All Dogs Go To Heaven 2.
I wasn't designed to be carried.
En Taro Igel!
Lift me up, let me go...
Joined Aug 2019
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
Something I should note, this was in a section discussing how sexual deviations and fetishes aren't wrong and shouldn't be condemned or seen as "unnatural", and that individuals should embrace and accept their deviations. While "deviation" may often be intended in an insulting or offensive manner, in this context it is being used to explain why asexuality is being listed among the other sexualities, and why it too should be accepted.
I also don't necessarily agree with the second paragraph, about being sexually sublimated by their jobs. Regardless, even in modern times, this acceptance of asexuality would be seen as rather progressive. Over half a century ago, when this was written, something like this was practically unheard of.
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
"Even the asexual has a deviation - his asexuality. It is far more abnormal to have a lack of sexual desire (unless illness or old-age, or another valid reason has caused the wane) than it is to be sexually promiscuous. However, if a Satanist chooses sexual sublimation over overt sexual expression, that is entirely his own affair. In many cases of sexual sublimation (or asexuality), any attempt to emancipate himself sexually would prove devastating to the asexual.
Asexuals are invariably sexually sublimated by their jobs or hobbies. All the energy and driving interest which would normally be devoted to sexual activity is channeled into other pastimes or into their chosen occupation. If a person favors other interests over sexual activity, it is his right, and no one is justified in condemning him for it. However, the person should at least recognize the fact that this is a sexual sublimation."
(Anton LaVey, The Satanic Bible, 1969)
I consider it very interesting that Satanism has officially considered asexuality to be a valid identity, and condoned and accepted it, going all the way back to its foundation in the 1960's. Acceptance of asexuality among the LGBT community is very recent, only a decade or two ago you'd find countless people denying that it even existed. Even today, many in the LGBT community exclude asexuals, or don't accept the validity of asexuality. And yet Satanism - a highly sexual religion - has accepted asexuality from its foundation in the 60's. Sexual freedom is an incredibly important part of Satanism, but sexual freedom doesn't necessarily mean promiscuity. Many who claim to promote concepts of "sexual freedom" and empowerment have very narrow definitions of what that "freedom" includes. Someone who wishes to devote themselves to a single person and remain monogamous should be free to do so, if they are truly sexually free. Someone who doesn't want to have sex at all should be free to do so, if they are truly sexually free. Someone who wishes to be in a committed relationship with two or more people at once should be free to do so. Someone who doesn't want to be in a relationship at all, and just wants to have sex with no strings attached should be free to do so. Someone who doesn't wish to have sex with someone should be free to refuse consent, for any reason whatsoever, or even for no reason at all. For true sexual freedom, all of these things must be accepted and seen as valid.
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
"Public figures often apologize after making controversial statements. There are reasons to believe, however, that apologizing makes public figures appear weak and risk averse, which may make them less likeable and lead members of the public to want to punish them. This paper presents the results of an experiment in which respondents were given two versions of two real-life controversies involving public figures. Approximately half of the participants read a story that made it appear as if the person had apologized, while the rest were led to believe that the individual had stood firm. In the first experiment, hearing that Rand Paul apologized for his comments on civil rights did not change whether respondents were less likely to vote for him. When presented with two versions of the controversy surrounding Larry Summers and his comments about women scientists and engineers, however, liberals and females were more likely to say that he should have faced negative consequences for his statement when presented with his apology. The effects on other groups were smaller or neutral. The evidence suggests that when a prominent figure apologizes for a controversial statement, individuals are either unaffected or become more likely to desire that the individual be punished."
I need this in my life.
If person A is highly addicted to thing X, and person B, knowing this full well, keeps shoving it in person A's face constantly, desperately trying to get them to buy it, does this still count as a consensual transaction exchange, or where does it start veering into manipulating territory?
Unpopular opinion: sex work is highly manipulative, but not in the way you expected.
Women sex workers take advantage of a biological weakness of men, and manipulate them to give up their money, often for "work" that is insanely overvalued. It's basically equivalent to men taking advantage of women's weaker strength to force them to do something against their better judgement and will.
P.S. This post isn't intended as an argument against sex work of any kind, just more of a food for thought for anyone claiming that women are being exploited in the various sex work industries.
Also, it's just something that came to me like 5 minutes ago. Don't take it too seriously.
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
Public false rape/sexual harassment accusations should be a jailable offense.
@alyx public claims like this also endanger their life with the potential for vigilantes trying to enact justice where the law has "failed".
False rape accusations are a huge issue, you can effectively end someones life without any evidence or recourse.
Public false rape/sexual harassment accusations should be a jailable offense.
Hear me out, if you don't go public with a false rape accusation, but only report it to the police, and it gets proven false, you mostly waste time for the law enforcers, and the accused, while having gone through some hardship, at least can recover his life back to normal quick enough.
If you go public with it, you also waste time of maybe millions of people who learn about the accusation and waste time either white knighting or trying to figure out if the claim is likely true or false. On top of that, even assuming the false claim gets proven 100% false (which is unlikely, since it can be insanely difficult to prove something didn't happen, and it's an unreasonable legal standard to hold to), very few people of those that heard about the initial claim will also hear about the accused's innocence, and even fewer will actually believe it, leaving the accused forever a pariah, unable to resume his normal life. Thus, much more damage is being caused to not only the accused but to society itself once you make your false rape claim public, and you should be punished accordingly for it.
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
Remember Fediverse when dealing with Americans there is only two ways to do things:
>The American Way
>The Wrong Way
>The American Way
>The Wrong Way
Left wing atheist (Tracie Harris):
>Problem: USA has very high suicide rate among men
>studies show that if people fail their first suicide attempt, they're a lot less likely to try again
>most men go for a gun to commit suicide because it's highly efficient
>Solution to problem: ban guns more, so less men commit suicide
This shows just how faulty left-wing thinking can be. Sure, all of that is probably true, if you ban guns, successful suicide rates are probably gonna drop drastically, but you're still not actually solving the issue. You're putting a band-aid over it.
The issue isn't the suicides, the issue is: why are so many men in USA so depressed and miserable to the point where want to be released from this mortal coil.
Banning guns as a solution to suicides is as logical as Foxconn putting safety nets around its building. Just because you deny/prevent someone from committing suicide doesn't mean they'll suddenly go looking for help for their mental problems. They're just gonna continue suffering on their own for a lot longer. Technically speaking, you're basically a sadist trying to torture them as much as possible, instead of actually trying to understand their problems and reaching out to give them a hand.
And the most absurd part of all of this, is that I guarantee you that the same person that advocated for this "solution" is probably pro-euthanasia (assisted suicide) for the terminally ill. Maybe I'm missing something, but I find this highly self-contradicting. Either you're fine with allowing people to have control over their life and death, or you're not. You can't have it both ways.
P.S. For anyone curious, I'm pro assisted suicide; and I think citing suicide rates is a terrible, completely inadmissible, argument for banning guns.
I should keep a link for this video for the next time someone gets offended when I call them an useful idiot.
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
@igel alright alright, you're special, completely not like others
Alyx Hinata 🇹🇩🚫💀
boosted
💀
boosted
A trip down memory lane.
P.S. Who here has ever played The Need For Speed?
Igel, I'd rather talk about politics, than idly sit by while the world collapses into another communist totalitarian system.
Antifa are the new nazis.
You all have forgotten your history if you think the reason the nazis and Hitler came into power was because Germany suddenly got tens of millions of racists to vote for the Nazi party. No. They rose to power because they formed the brownshirts organization that terrorized people and disrupted public events of anyone of an opposing ideology; and then they came with the "solution" to end their own violence. Let the nazis rule. Oh, and they were called brownshirts, because they wore the same fucking clothes. Reminds you of anyone?
Antifa:
- black block (all black clothes)
- can't help themselves but interrupt, protest, and get into fights with any right wing rally
- creates terror
- attacks innocent people
- destroys private property
- makes demands that the government subject itself to their will; in effect demanding power so they'll stop their shenanigans.
The list could probably go on, but in any case, I laugh my ass off at the incompetence and ignorance of anyone claiming Trump's the big bad. Bruh, Trump has NO all-encompassing ideology. Antifa has the "muh white-male patriarchy and systematic racism" that somehow affects every single thing imaginable. Anything and everything must be explained by this single ideology.
And if you want to claim the Proud Boys is Trump's "brownshirts", may I remind you that there is no connection between Trump and them.The Proud Boys literally have had issues with government authorities, with Trump's government, and got no help from the "big bad". Antifa on the other hand gets regularly defended by both the mainstream media and left-wing politicians. And need I remind you that they literally got donations just recently to get them out of prison?
Antifa is the left-wing's paramilitary group. And they are doing the same exact kinds of shit that terrorized the German people enough to vote for a psychopathic maniac. Ask yourself, who is it that these fuckers want you to vote for now.
- Gender:
- Yes, I definitely have one of those.
- Sex:
- Yes, please!
- Clan:
- Hyūga
- Nationality:
- Martian
- Location:
- Neptune
- Occupation:
- Retired
なんで君はこれを読んでいるかよ
Just another random person passing by.
Oh hi.
The Alyx Vance must go this way anyway.
Gordon Freeman dies in All Dogs Go To Heaven 2.
I wasn't designed to be carried.
En Taro Igel!
Lift me up, let me go...
Joined Aug 2019
