@SystemSock @matrix wow you glossed over my pronouns and the part where it says i'm not a MAP! impressive!

@KayFaraday @matrix You wrote in your profile that you are a pedo socially and politically, so a pedo and a pro-pedo advocate/activist.

@SystemSock @matrix

pro-pedo advocate/activist

yes

a pedo

no (again not like it matters)

@KayFaraday @matrix
> Don't advocate for fucking kids
> Pro-pedo activist.
This is your brain on leftism.

Just kill yourself.
@waltercool @SystemSock @KayFaraday @matrix consider for a moment that hardened killers and utterly evil people will *literally murder* pedophiles in prison.

the monsters in the dark hate kid touchers.

@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock the majority of pedophiles do not commit sexual offenses, and while murdering anyone for any reason is abhorrent, killing someone for an unchosen attraction especially so!

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @SystemSock I'm super open mind and not necessarily disagree with pedophiles in theory (because philias/phobias might be mental sickness).

Now, if someone, whatever is pedophile/MAP/drunk/high/weirdo attempts something against a real child, it deserves the worst, just like any rapist.

There is an "acceptable age range" formula for that. Anything outside that is super weird at most societies, specially on kids.

If you like kids, then I would strongly suggest to watch toddlercon/shotacon/lolicon instead. Drawn art doesn't harm real humans.
@KayFaraday @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock i don't really care as long as they don't touch actual children. :cirno_shrug:

@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock then be specific: you could say "child abuser" instead of "pedophile" next time, as the latter refers only to an attraction

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock The reason people hate even non contact pedos is because you’re all like this. You attempt to defend and normalize the attraction, and play these pointless semantics games to defend pedophiles. You are truly some of the most vile and reprehensible people on the planet. Hide behind “I don’t rape kids” all you want, you’re still normalizing it and defending them.

@galena @icedquinn @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock I don't defend any rape! Not sure where that came from. I defend pedophiles as I defend zoos, necrophiles, biastophiles, etc, all paraphiles are okay because all attractions are morally neutral.

@Dean @galena @icedquinn @KayFaraday @matrix @SystemSock Except heterosexuals or even homosexuals would hang rapists if they can. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-18522383

Childs can’t consent, and that’s a very irrefutable fact.

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @galena @KayFaraday @SystemSock That's irrelevant, the statement made was incorrect, stating that "defending paedos inevitably leads to defending rape" is equivalent to stating that "defending homosexuality inevitably leads to defending rape".

Follow

@Dean @waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @galena @KayFaraday @SystemSock No, defending fags means defending gay prolapse scat sex, yes, obviously.

Defending child marriage, pedos, whatever, means you're defending child sex too, and that's a good thing!

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.