@SystemSock @matrix wow you glossed over my pronouns and the part where it says i'm not a MAP! impressive!

@KayFaraday @matrix You wrote in your profile that you are a pedo socially and politically, so a pedo and a pro-pedo advocate/activist.

@SystemSock @matrix

pro-pedo advocate/activist

yes

a pedo

no (again not like it matters)

@KayFaraday @matrix
> Don't advocate for fucking kids
> Pro-pedo activist.
This is your brain on leftism.

Just kill yourself.
@waltercool @SystemSock @KayFaraday @matrix consider for a moment that hardened killers and utterly evil people will *literally murder* pedophiles in prison.

the monsters in the dark hate kid touchers.

@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock the majority of pedophiles do not commit sexual offenses, and while murdering anyone for any reason is abhorrent, killing someone for an unchosen attraction especially so!

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @SystemSock I'm super open mind and not necessarily disagree with pedophiles in theory (because philias/phobias might be mental sickness).

Now, if someone, whatever is pedophile/MAP/drunk/high/weirdo attempts something against a real child, it deserves the worst, just like any rapist.

There is an "acceptable age range" formula for that. Anything outside that is super weird at most societies, specially on kids.

If you like kids, then I would strongly suggest to watch toddlercon/shotacon/lolicon instead. Drawn art doesn't harm real humans.
@KayFaraday @waltercool @matrix @SystemSock i don't really care as long as they don't touch actual children. :cirno_shrug:

@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock then be specific: you could say "child abuser" instead of "pedophile" next time, as the latter refers only to an attraction

@KayFaraday @icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock The reason people hate even non contact pedos is because you’re all like this. You attempt to defend and normalize the attraction, and play these pointless semantics games to defend pedophiles. You are truly some of the most vile and reprehensible people on the planet. Hide behind “I don’t rape kids” all you want, you’re still normalizing it and defending them.

@galena @KayFaraday @SystemSock @icedquinn @matrix It's complicated. I don't believe on strict age restrictions, every person grow up differently.

Now, kids should be kids, teens should be teens, adults should be adults. Understanding kids can't consent or teens aren't legally responsible of their acts, it's because those social rules kinda exists.

If MAPs only means "I like kids, I can't do anything against it", it's fine, be like the Lolicons/Shotacons/Toddlercons and enjoy watching content, but just like them, don't do your perversions on real people.

While watching pictures won't harm anyone in theory, trying something on kids will cause a severe damage on some human.

I don't know any person with "touchy uncle experiences" saying something good about it.

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @galena @SystemSock mm, there are negative ones too, but it's hard to pin down numbers because researchers tend to assume that all such relationships are negative rather than researching that question. hence more research is needed IMO.

@KayFaraday @SystemSock @galena @icedquinn @matrix Because, there are lot of people as well who get in love with rapists. Stockholm syndrome exists because of that.

That doesn't mean rapists are cool guys or a relevant number of positive feedback.
Follow

@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @galena @KayFaraday @SystemSock

The only stockholm syndrome here is from the people gaslighting others into thinking something they enjoyed, that they wanted, that didn't harm them in any way, was actually horrible and they SHOULD feel horrible

Revealing it is universally marked by more harm than not, and the reason is obvious

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.