@KayFaraday >pedo.school
@matrix says the lolicon!
@KayFaraday At least I don't advocate for fucking kids
@KayFaraday
And animals too....
Bro
@SystemSock @matrix wow you glossed over my pronouns and the part where it says i'm not a MAP! impressive!
> Don't advocate for fucking kids
> Pro-pedo activist.
This is your brain on leftism.
Just kill yourself.
the monsters in the dark hate kid touchers.
@icedquinn @matrix @waltercool @SystemSock the majority of pedophiles do not commit sexual offenses, and while murdering anyone for any reason is abhorrent, killing someone for an unchosen attraction especially so!
Now, if someone, whatever is pedophile/MAP/drunk/high/weirdo attempts something against a real child, it deserves the worst, just like any rapist.
There is an "acceptable age range" formula for that. Anything outside that is super weird at most societies, specially on kids.
If you like kids, then I would strongly suggest to watch toddlercon/shotacon/lolicon instead. Drawn art doesn't harm real humans.
@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock
>mental sickness
The historical average was 20+ men marrying 12-16yo girls. Still today: 5 more phallometric studies indicating proportion of men more or equally sexually aroused by children (up to 13 years old) than by adults:
27.7% (Firestone et al. 2000)
14.3% (Marshall et al. 1986)
18.3% (Fedora et al. 1992)
19.4% (Freund et al. 1991)
25% (Seto et al. 2000)
men rated female faces about 13 years old the most attractive: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237004330_Facial_Olfactory_and_Vocal_Cues_to_Female_Reproductive_Value
The BMI men find the most attractive is about 17-20 which is the typical BMI for girls about 13. Women naturally get fatter when they start having babies so a low BMI is another sign of nulliparity and youth.
>There is an "acceptable age range"
An arbitrary one
>at most societies
Citation needed. The idea of not being able to marry a 12yo was absurd in every society just 200 years ago
> Citation needed.
That's an easy test, you can try. Go to some big social network, and ask people if they would be OK if you would date a 12yo girl as a 20yo person.
> The idea of not being able to marry a 12yo was absurd in every society just 200 years ago
The world is radically different than 200yo lmao, it's even socially very different than 80yo
@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock White countries are jewed so they care. Nobody else does. You can have a 12yo gf in south america, or asia, or africa, or ME, or whatever, and nobody really cares unless it's to uphold some shittest set by white countries. Japan still allows you to be in a sexual relationship with a 12yo if you can prove that it's real love
>The world is radically different than 200yo lmao
Yes, and that's a bad thing. Natural evolved traditions over arbitrarily modern garbage. There is no good justification for it
@applejack @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock If you are OK with societies where some people have more rights than others because their sex or race… fine.
I’m not, and won’t debate about it.
Being pro-traditions is great, but enforcing a social caste isn’t.
@waltercool @icedquinn @matrix @KayFaraday @SystemSock
>than others because their sex or race
Right's don't exist. They're not something worth worrying about because they're not real. Actual people are real, and actual people have evolved histories that you can't ignore for arbitrary concepts. Women evolved to be mothers, men evolved to be providers. Happiness evolved as a driver of function. Thinking anything else makes you retarded
