@Mr_NutterButter @LukeAlmighty I'm not a libertarian. I literally said "and that's why you should be anti-pro-freedom". Because being pro-freedom means you need to accept migrants, libertarianism is bad

@applejack @Mr_NutterButter @LukeAlmighty Libertarianism is inherently opposed to open borders. "Stay off my private property." Unfortunately, like most pro-freedom ideologies, it has been thoroughly corrupted and subverted by leftist infiltrators, who turned libertarianism into yet another front for leftism.

@galena @LukeAlmighty @Mr_NutterButter

No, libertarianism is inherently opposed to the idea of public "property"

And this just shits it anyway. If people commonly own it they can commonly allow it

Libertarianism isn't really right or left. You can ask where on the political compass a bunch of people who worship a rock are, but it's kinda silly. Libertarians worship something worse than a rock, something that's not even physical. It's just retarded

>by leftist infiltrators
You can only be infiltrated if you're not explicitly right-wing to begin with. I think there was a saying around it

@applejack @LukeAlmighty @Mr_NutterButter Read Hoppe

@galena @LukeAlmighty @Mr_NutterButter
Already done. He doesn't really do the "because I say so" thing like Rothbard's "I own myself because something something non-arbitrary" or whatever. He basically just makes a consequentialist point, which I agree with. "Libertarian society good, if something harms it, throw it out" which makes complete sense if you accept that prior. He's pretty based overall, but it's only because he doesn't do the deontological (which libertarianism is inherently) garbage

Hoppe would actually say "No, you can't just leave your child in the woods to starve to death because it's not 'an aggression'. Fuck you" like true libertarian Rothbard does