@marine @kino @NEETzsche @nyx thats literally the entire point that I'm making.
Actually the whole point you’re trying to make is that rightists are groomers, when the reality is all you have is a cherry picked rightoid who associated with someone who is in prison for child trafficking vs rightists highlighting the institutionalized child grooming that pretty much the entire left wing is pushing. It’s, as I said before, an obvious deflection. Nice try, though?
@NEETzsche @kino @marine @nyx Didn't read your post, you can't tell me the point I'm making.
Well, ITT vriska not only defending child groomers but actively tried to make a joke about how I need to kys for being molested by a person with blue hair or something (never happened, it’s just part of their child rape fantasies)
:labrys-45-sickle: 
but then again, if I may offer a counterargument to my own statement for the sake of this dialogue: one could argue that it would be more merciful for you to kill yourself now rather than continue to live the life you're living where you are clearly a deeply miserable person whose soul is poisoned with resentment (ironic for a person with a nietzsche avi). so perhaps you shouldn't kill yourself; perhaps your life is in fact worth living because you are in your own personal hell and deserve to be punished for the stain on your soul of being a pathetic miserable little cuck on the internet.
tldr, groomer
>sends me child pornography
Well, really making a very compelling argument. Deactivated for sending CP.
I’m not allowing sexualized images of children on my shit, real or illustrated.
The most dangerous part and the actual CORE of this hellthread is this.
https://shitposter.club/notice/AQ90fGCVpuhEFZU2ZU
That it's somehow OK to believe that children are JUST FINE dealing with sexualized events, people and issues when they can't even do long division. And, on top of this, it's something we MUST DO to children, so they are allowed to experience something that is non-"cishet", just in case they were born non-"cishet". To "open their minds". This is the definition of grooming: you get kids USED TO sex so you can diddle them.
And this is what the right, as a frigging cohesive, solid and complete UNIT is fighting, to the point it's become the probably top talking point for it. And we're being shown slime girl lolicon as a fucking argument against it.
The slime is just oozing out of this whole thing, a black, viscous, smelly and very... VERY paedophilic ooze.
tl;dr i'm on your side of the argument, it's just funny to make fun of neetzsche/people like him
@Corfiot @CumskinFoidPuncher69420 @kino @NEETzsche @vriska @marine @nyx bruh that's not even loli, but even if it was i'm just trolling because i know neetzsche is a hypocritical sensationalist that thinks he's always got the moral high ground because he's one of god's chosen people. saying art is CP is an absolutely braindead take, just say you don't want lolicon on your site or something lmao. dude is not grounded in reality. i mean look he's so far up his own ass he's gotta be all like "deactivated for sending CP" like he's bragging about a legitimate pwning.
rest of the thread is probably too long with too many people saying too many different things for me to go spelunking through it and most of it isn't even federated for me but for the record, kids shouldn't be exposed to extreme ideas period and i think parents are fucking retarded for letting them be around places where they'll get introduced to it without any intervention whatsoever, and it ruins my fun when websites are sanitized for kids that shouldn't even be there. it's absolutely a way for kids to just get preyed on.
it's also funny to me that these were the same kinds of people who, as recent as like 10 years ago, were saying that boys can like pink and play with dolls, and girls can like camo and play with trucks... but now if you do that you are no longer a boy and no longer a girl. femboys and tomboys don't exist, in fact they're an affront to the whole trans movement.
re: tl;dr i'm on your side of the argument, it's just funny to make fun of neetzsche/people like him
re: tl;dr i'm on your side of the argument, it's just funny to make fun of neetzsche/people like him
@CumskinFoidPuncher69420 @kino @NEETzsche @vriska @Corfiot @marine @nyx this is how they control everything, by trying to control the language we use.
and that's why "loli = cp" is fucking retarded because it's the same shit as "trap = trans slur."
trying to justify not liking something so much that they want it banned by hooking it into another thing that people on their side of politics dislike. appealing to emotion with sensationalism and playing into perpetual victimhood because it fuels them.
I take the opposite approach: let the kiddie porn run rampant; it's evidence. Evidence of malfeasance. Catalogue it for police use.
Probably just as well; they'd drag in everybody with a copy of Romeo and Juliet.
If you actually read Shakespeare's plays, you can more-or-less stuff them into two categories: politically correct sucking up to the powers that be, and sensationalist horseshit to please the masses. Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, Othello, King Lear and Hamlet all fall into that latter category.
That doesn't make me content with the crap. And many folktales were cautionary tales as well; consider Hansel and Gretel, for example.
Nothing. If anything, there's more redeeming value to them than a lot of other stuff.
Science Fiction (the hard stuff, not pew-pew laser fantasy) does more to advance the human condition than most Shakespeare (even ignoring that he'd stolen a lot of other work).
Tom Stoppard was pretty much on point in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, when he had his Player King character peg it as Love, Blood and Rhetoric.
"Well, I can do you Love and Blood without the Rhetoric, or Rhetoric and Blood without the Love, or I can give you all three, concurrent or consecutive but I can't give you Love and Rhetoric without the Blood. Blood's compulsory. They're all Blood, y'see?"
Iliad and Odyssey were effectively folktales, pieced together through oral tradition.
re: tl;dr i'm on your side of the argument, it's just funny to make fun of neetzsche/people like him
https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/i1ssea/here_we_see_farright_polish_politician_janusz/
>It may surprise you, but femboys actually have a fame of being associated with far-right ideologies
>They really like the idea of a patriarchal, traditionalist society where women just wear dresses and look pretty.
>It's just that they want to be the women in that equation.
>They might not consider themselves lgbt as it’s more of a fetish?
>Why do you think he's holding that femboy? He wants a gf with who he can hold intellectual discussions with.
and this was two years ago