Something that frustrates me about most historical fiction is that the hero is almost always out of place and time. The hero and his companions act and hold beliefs like a modern westerner, even when everyone around them doesn't. Even when the belief was so ubiquitous that it was held by 99% of the population. Somehow, your hero is always in that 1%.
This is even worse in RPGs because they offer you a choice, but that choice is usually limited to "be nice like a westerner" or "ignore it."
@newt As far as I tried in KCD you can kill everyone except story characters.
@newt True. You should be able to just lock yourself out of the story by killing a story character
@newt @matrix in something like D&D where there is ultimate player choice, and unlimited ways for DMs to drum up consequences and story leads on the spot, this can work. For a video game, it's much harder. Maybe it'll be more feasible once there is better AI. You just can't hard code all these different paths a player can take in such a massive environment and still have a story that seems the least bit cohesive. I don't know if there is a single game out there with such freedom. I think the closest thing is potentially Morrowind, where you can kill important characters and it just tells you that you fucked up and should re-load a save. Maybe there is a text-based RPG that lets you do that too, I can see it being much easier to implement in something like that.
@newt @matrix I'll also add that this is really only a consideration in a western rpg, where you're playing the role of "yourself" more than an established character. JRPGs are a lot more focused on the narrative and getting into the shoes of a specific character archetype. That is to say, there are varying degrees on how far any given RPG can go with its freedom depending on the experience it wants to offer.