> noagendasocial.com/@coldacid/1

I may be mistaken, but i think there's just no way to force a "global" moderation policy on the fediverse, because of the decentralized way it's constructed?

To force something like that would need to deviate from the open protocol, and people can always choose to not adopt those modifications.

@hideki @hideki
As I've theorized before global moderation would take the form of whitelisting. They'll make an approved network and they'll extend that network to those that follow their blocklists and/or fedi social credit.

Twitter already has the reddit downvote, EU wanted that for fedi. Fedi social credit could be used to enforce global moderation policy by forcing instances to moderate in a certain way.

One could say it doesn't matter because these instances were gonna block us anyway so nobody has to bend the knee to them. But it does matter if someone wants to make an instance but all they know is "mastodon=fedi". You can see it in the coverage of fedi right now, Pleroma/misskey is not mentioned. Lack of knowledge will cut into people wanting to break out of the censorship spiral, which is what "they" want.

@zemichi @hideki
I hate that on fedi, admins block servers saying: If newbies don't like what I offer, they will choose another instance.

How, when they have no idea the free fedi exists?

Follow

@LukeAlmighty @zemichi if someone is free of mind, he will eventually look for the light in the sea of darkness, otherwise, he will always lurk.

· · Dashboard FE · 0 · 0 · 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.