@matrix what would the alternative be?
@igel Literally anything
@matrix
>ok you make website in javascript, you want that in a box to make users install it (autostart on pc make software go brrr on startup = more money)
>Coding lead says "we will do it in c++"
>You fire retard
>ok you make website in javascript, you want that in a box to make users install it (autostart on pc make software go brrr on startup = more money)
>Coding lead says "we will do it in c++"
>You fire retard
@igel
>make a website
>want users to have an app
>just take full featured browser
>make it only open your site
>screw user CPUs and RAM
@matrix "lite weight" development hasnt been a thing for years, youve been in a coma
@matrix make a more cost effecient thing and companies will use it
@igel @matrix we're all aware, that's why we're complaining so much. ecmascript and web browsers only took off so full-forced due to extensive warring between netscape and others in the early days of the WWW, now we live with the fallout of that. we could have had better OSes by now and then native software *would be* the more cost-effective
i know youre a chronic shitposter but framing it as "YOU do something about it" isnt helping one bit. i'm actually trying to do something about it but at small scale, i can't build rome in a day
i know youre a chronic shitposter but framing it as "YOU do something about it" isnt helping one bit. i'm actually trying to do something about it but at small scale, i can't build rome in a day
