Kinda sucks when your own defense lawyer is against you.
The article is weirdly worded. It's not clear whether he only had loli hentai or had cp on top of it.
sankakucomplex.com/2020/09/24/

"The court heard he was in possession of photographs and videos including some showing children under the age of 14, The Advertiser reported."

"Prosecutor Pantelia Marinakis told the court Lunnay had confessed to a psychologist he had no interest in child exploitation material."

So was he a pedo or just a degenerate coomer? Top A journalism and prosecution

@matrix
Why not both?
Also, how do you save that shit if you have no interest? That makes no sense!
And the offense is possession of such material as far as I can tell, whether or not you are interested in it plays no role...
Follow

@Kagekokoro
The article doesn't actually specify what he was in possession of.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.