Kinda sucks when your own defense lawyer is against you.
The article is weirdly worded. It's not clear whether he only had loli hentai or had cp on top of it.
https://www.sankakucomplex.com/2020/09/24/australian-arrested-for-importing-loli-erotica-judge-blames-hentai-anime/
Great truthful and neutral headline you got there Daily Mail
https://archive.vn/Z2l46
They will flat out state you have Child Porn even than it was just loli in Australia.
even though it is*
@Jack
Aussies can be retarded sometimes. Maybe the heat and sun burned their brain out.
The even more retarded thing is that they carry on like Loli = CP but the sentencing tends to be quite minor.
So they publicly fuck a guys life just to give him a minor sentence.
@Jack
I don't know. The article doesn't mention the sentence. Maybe it's not decided yet.
I was more referring to cases I have heard about in the past.
Why not both?
Also, how do you save that shit if you have no interest? That makes no sense!
And the offense is possession of such material as far as I can tell, whether or not you are interested in it plays no role...
@Kagekokoro
The article doesn't actually specify what he was in possession of.
@Kagekokoro @matrix still better then czech law...
Avcording to czech law, you are guilty for 'having an access' to cp.
I am afraid of the day they realize that anyone connected to the internet 'has access' co it... 
"The court heard he was in possession of photographs and videos including some showing children under the age of 14, The Advertiser reported."
"Prosecutor Pantelia Marinakis told the court Lunnay had confessed to a psychologist he had no interest in child exploitation material."
So was he a pedo or just a degenerate coomer? Top A journalism and prosecution