@Moon The article is up still https://archive.fo/8PhCx
@ArdanianRight @matrix They're literally just pointing out a normal psychological fact because people are so retarded around the whole concept (like now), as did the salon article. This isn't actually something bold or niche
>The term pedophile is commonly used by the public to describe all child sexual abuse offenders.[8][12] This usage is considered problematic by researchers, because many child molesters do not have a strong sexual interest in prepubescent children, and are consequently not pedophiles.[11][12][25]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Pedophilia_and_child_molestation
And remember the media stigmatised it in the first place. The US AOC was 7-12 in 1880 and similar in every western country. It's historically universally normal
@ArdanianRight @matrix Oh, and this
>Some pedophiles do not molest children.[2] Little is known about this population because most studies of pedophilia use criminal or clinical samples, which may not be representative of pedophiles in general.[109]
@ArdanianRight I don't know the history of this person, but I don't see anything wrong with being said there.
The MAP label is very cringe though and is just effort from people who want to fuck kids.
@AidanTTIerian Jews already suck baby dick. They don't care.
@matrix ¿Y efebofilia?