@matrix
Is it weird, that I just don't get it?

Saying, that you are not free just because you decide to work for someone feels like an intellectual equivalent to saying, that god exists because tree.

Follow

@LukeAlmighty I feel that most of the time this argument is made by lazy people trying to avoid responsibilities, but there are circumstances under which it's valid imo, mainly under some monopoly where your rights aren't technically violated, but there's only one available employer and it's not feasible to start your own business so your choice of association is limited.

Or with an example of speech, when majority of communication is done on the internet, but nobody wants to provide you service to host your legal site, none of your rights were violated, but your ability to say things gets in effect limited.

· Edited · · Web · 1 · 0 · 1

@matrix
Ok, speech is a fucking rock solid counter argument. thanks.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.