matrix07012 
@matrix@gameliberty.club
- Twatter
- https://twitter.com/matrix07012
- Discord
- matrix07012
Admin
I'm the joke, but you're the punchline.
I run this website. I like posting funnies and fugging lolis.
Joined Oct 2018
matrix07012
boosted
boosted
If you want to stop child porn, you have to pay us. No we won't do it for free. Yes we're the only way to do it, and no we won't open source it. Remember this is about money, not children.
@applejack largely exaggerated though in such case
matrix07012
boosted
boosted
and 
matrix07012
boosted
boosted
Can you believe that new Hyper Text Transfer Protocol has NO MECHANISM WHATSOEVER preventing it from being used to distribute kiddy porn? Can we all agree it should be banned?
"Demographics of apparent underage sellers of explicit content are notably different on the Fediverse: sellers tend to primarily be teenage boys or transgender girls, while on other platforms sellers are almost entirely cisgender girls"
matrix07012
boosted
boosted
@sjw no clue, haven't seen it yet
matrix07012
boosted
boosted
> to detect csam, they use hashes of regions of images
> no one talks about how they got the hashes
> the hashes are a proprietary product
> you must pay in to use the hashes to block/filter images
> if you try to make your own hashes, you're admitting to possession of csam
> the owners of the hashes say that the hashes could be used for nefarious purposes if made public (this claim falls flat on its face when you realise that finding a hash of a subset of an image is extremely expensive for a processor, so searching for that needle in the internet's haystack would be more in the realm of blackhat work than criminal consumer work)
> a monopoly controls protection against csam with hashes for which they cannot disclose their sources, and they charge a premium for what seems to be a broad societal need
It's really hard not to think that at least some subset of the governmental and nonprofit operations that deal with CSAM are pedophiles.
> no one talks about how they got the hashes
> the hashes are a proprietary product
> you must pay in to use the hashes to block/filter images
> if you try to make your own hashes, you're admitting to possession of csam
> the owners of the hashes say that the hashes could be used for nefarious purposes if made public (this claim falls flat on its face when you realise that finding a hash of a subset of an image is extremely expensive for a processor, so searching for that needle in the internet's haystack would be more in the realm of blackhat work than criminal consumer work)
> a monopoly controls protection against csam with hashes for which they cannot disclose their sources, and they charge a premium for what seems to be a broad societal need
It's really hard not to think that at least some subset of the governmental and nonprofit operations that deal with CSAM are pedophiles.
@r000t Not always, but conservatives defend status quo, so by definition they are morelikely going to be on the defense then offense.
matrix07012
boosted
boosted
matrix07012
boosted
boosted
Turns out that Web Environment Integrity proposal everybody is getting angry about (imo very legitimately) was effectively already shipped by Apple in Safari last year: https://httptoolkit.com/blog/apple-private-access-tokens-attestation/
That means if Chromium ships it too, we could quickly move to 90%+ of browser traffic being attested. Not good!
matrix07012
boosted
boosted
- Twatter
- https://twitter.com/matrix07012
- Discord
- matrix07012
Admin
I'm the joke, but you're the punchline.
I run this website. I like posting funnies and fugging lolis.
Joined Oct 2018
